Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 45, Issue 6 , Pages 643-652, June 2005

Medical Treatment of Radiological Casualties: Current Concepts

From the University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA (Koenig); Occupational and Radiation Medicine, MJW Corporation, and Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Clinton, TN (Goans); Division of Clinical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Hatchett); Department of Radiology, New Mexico Federal Regional Medical Center, Albuquerque, NM (Mettler); VA Medical Emergency Radiological Response Team, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN (Schumacher); Chemical and Biological Defense Program, Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense, the Pentagon, Washington, DC (Noji); and the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD (Jarrett)

Received 5 October 2004; received in revised form 5 January 2005; accepted 14 January 2005. published online 28 April 2005.

SEE EDITORIAL, P. 653.

The threat of radiologic or nuclear terrorism is increasing, yet many physicians are unfamiliar with basic treatment principles for radiologic casualties. Patients may present for care after a covert radiation exposure, requiring an elevated level of suspicion by the physician. Traditional medical and surgical triage criteria should always take precedence over radiation exposure management or decontamination. External contamination from a radioactive cloud is easily evaluated using a simple Geiger-Müller counter and decontamination accomplished by prompt removal of clothing and traditional showering. Management of surgical conditions in the presence of persistent radioactive contamination should be dealt with in a conventional manner with health physics guidance. To be most effective in the medical management of a terrorist event involving high-level radiation, physicians should understand basic manifestations of the acute radiation syndrome, the available medical countermeasures, and the psychosocial implications of radiation incidents. Health policy considerations include stockpiling strategies, effective use of risk communications, and decisionmaking for shelter-in-place versus evacuation after a radiologic incident.

 

 Funding and support: The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.

PII: S0196-0644(05)00086-7

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.01.020

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 45, Issue 6 , Pages 643-652, June 2005