Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 48, Issue 2 , Pages 200-211, August 2006

Anthrax: A Systematic Review of Atypical Presentations

  • Jon-Erik C. Holty, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
    • Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Jon-Erik C. Holty, MD, MS, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, H3143, Stanford, CA 94305-5236; 650-723-6381, fax 650-725-5489
  • ,
  • Rebecca Y. Kim, BA

      Affiliations

    • Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
  • ,
  • Dena M. Bravata, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
    • Stanford–University of California San Francisco Evidence-based Practice Center, Stanford, CA

Received 5 May 2005; received in revised form 13 November 2005; accepted 28 November 2005. published online 23 February 2006.

During the 2001 US anthrax attacks, mortality from inhalational anthrax was significantly lower than had been reported historically, which was attributed in part to early identification and timely treatment. During future attacks, clinicians will rely on published descriptions of the clinical features of inhalational anthrax to rapidly diagnose patients and institute appropriate treatment. Published descriptions of typical inhalation anthrax usually include patients presenting with cough, dyspnea, or chest pain and found to have abnormal lung examination results with pleural effusions or enlarged mediastinum. The purpose of this article is to evaluate whether atypical presentations of inhalational anthrax occur and to describe the features of these presentations. We define atypical presentations as those in patients with confirmed anthrax infection who do not have known cutaneous, gastrointestinal, or inhalational ports of entry. We reviewed the case reports of 42 patients with atypical anthrax (published between 1900 and 2004) that may have had an inhalational source of infection to evaluate whether their clinical presentations differed from the typical findings of inhalational anthrax. Patients with atypical anthrax were less likely to have cough, chest pain, or abnormal lung examination results than patients with typical inhalational anthrax (P<.05 for all comparisons). A previously published screening protocol for patients with suspected anthrax correctly identified 91% of patients with atypical presentations. We conclude that although uncommon, atypical presentations of inhalational anthrax likely occur. Timely diagnosis and treatment of patients with inhalational anthrax require clinical awareness of the full spectrum of signs and symptoms associated with inhalational anthrax.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Jonathan L. Burstein, MDFunding and support: This work was performed under the auspices of the Stanford-University of California San Francisco Evidence-based Practice Center under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (contract number 290-02-0017), Rockville, MD. The authors of this article are responsible for its contents, including any clinical or treatment recommendations. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or of the US Department of Health and Human Services. The project also was supported in part by the Department of Veterans Affairs.Publication dates: Available online February 21, 2006.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(05)01975-X

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.11.035

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 48, Issue 2 , Pages 200-211, August 2006