Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 48, Issue 5 , Pages 615-623, November 2006

Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial to Compare Extended Release Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen for the Treatment of Ankle Sprains

Presented at the 2005 American College of Sports Medicine annual meeting, June 2005, Nashville, TN.

  • James D. Dalton Jr, MD

      Affiliations

    • South Carolina Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Charleston, SC
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: James D. Dalton, Jr, MD, South Carolina Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, 9100 Medcom Street, Charleston, SC 29406; 843-572-2663, fax 843-572-3662
  • ,
  • Jo Ellen Schweinle, MD

      Affiliations

    • McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, Fort Washington, PA
    • Dr. Schweinle is currently employed by Novartis, Emeryville, CA.

Received 12 August 2005; received in revised form 23 January 2006 and 4 May 2006; accepted 11 May 2006. published online 31 August 2006.

Study objective

To compare acetaminophen extended release 1,300 mg 3 times daily and ibuprofen 400 mg 3 times daily for treatment of signs and symptoms of grade I or II lateral ankle sprains.

Methods

Patients (N=260) 18 years or older and with grade I or II lateral ankle sprains were randomized to receive acetaminophen extended release 1,300 mg 3 times daily or ibuprofen 400 mg 3 times daily for 9 days. Primary endpoint was change from baseline at day 4 in pain on walking. Other endpoints included change from baseline at day 9 in pain on walking; change from baseline at days 4 and 9 in ability to walk and ankle swelling, bruising, and range of motion; satisfaction with treatment on days 4 and 9; percentage of patients with positive anterior drawer test on day 4; and time to resume normal activity. Safety assessments consisted of reported adverse events. This study had a noninferiority design in which the hypothesis was that acetaminophen extended release was not inferior to ibuprofen for treatment of signs and symptoms of grade I or II lateral ankle sprains.

Results

The difference in least squares means (acetaminophen extended release, ibuprofen) with respect to the primary endpoint within the per-protocol population was −0.88; acetaminophen extended release was comparable to ibuprofen for the primary endpoint because the upper limit (3.26) of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in least squares means did not exceed the noninferiority limit of 6.90. The intention-to-treat population was used to test the second step of the 2-step testing process because the null hypothesis was rejected in the noninferiority test. For this analysis, the difference between acetaminophen extended release and ibuprofen in the least squares mean change from baseline for the primary endpoint was −1.63 (not significant). Results showed that acetaminophen extended release was noninferior to ibuprofen with respect to the secondary endpoints. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported. The most common adverse events, reported by 6.5% of patients, were in the gastrointestinal system (mainly nausea and upper abdominal pain).

Conclusion

Acetaminophen extended release 3,900 mg daily was comparable to ibuprofen 1,200 mg daily for treatment of grade I or II lateral ankle sprains. Both treatments were well tolerated.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Knox H. Todd, MDS, MPHAuthor contributions: JES assisted with study design and trial development. JES supervised overall conduct of the trial, data collection, and education of the participating centers. JDD and JES drafted the manuscript, and both authors contributed to its revision. JDD takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.Funding and support: Financial support for this study was provided by McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(06)00700-1

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.05.015

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 48, Issue 5 , Pages 615-623, November 2006