Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 50, Issue 3 , Pages 236-245, September 2007

Manual In-Line Stabilization for Acute Airway Management of Suspected Cervical Spine Injury: Historical Review and Current Questions

  • Seth Manoach, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Seth Manoach, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Downstate and Kings County Hospital Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Box 1228, Brooklyn, NY 11203; 718-270-1522, fax 718-245-4799
  • ,
  • Lorenzo Paladino, MD

Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York-Downstate and Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY.

Received 29 March 2006; received in revised form 14 May 2006, 11 June 2006, 16 October 2006 and 27 December 2006; accepted 16 January 2007. published online 10 March 2007.

Direct laryngoscopy with manual in-line stabilization is standard of care for acute trauma patients with suspected cervical spine injury. Ethical and methodologic constraints preclude controlled trials of manual in-line stabilization, and recent work questions its effectiveness. We searched MEDLINE, Index Medicus, Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Database, and article reference lists. According to this search, we present an ancestral review tracing the origins of manual in-line stabilization and an analysis of subsequent studies evaluating the risks and benefits of the procedure. All manual in-line stabilization data came from trials of uninjured patients, cadaveric models, and case series. The procedure was adopted because of reasonable inference from the benefits of stabilization during general care of spine-injured patients, weak empirical data, and expert opinion. More recent data indicate that direct laryngoscopy and intubation are unlikely to cause clinically significant movement and that manual in-line stabilization may not immobilize injured segments. In addition, manual in-line stabilization degrades laryngoscopic view, which may cause hypoxia and worsen outcomes in traumatic brain injury. Patients intubated in the emergency department with suspected cervical spine injury often have traumatic brain injury, but the incidence of unstable cervical lesions in this group is low. The limited available evidence suggests that allowing some flexion or extension of the head is unlikely to cause secondary injury and may facilitate prompt intubation in difficult cases. Despite the presumed safety and efficacy of direct laryngoscopy with manual in-line stabilization, alternative techniques that do not require direct visualization warrant investigation. Promising techniques include intubation through supraglottic airways, along with video laryngoscopes, optical stylets, and other imaging devices.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Richard M. Levitan, MDFunding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that may create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.Available online March 6, 2007.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(07)00069-8

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.01.009

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 50, Issue 3 , Pages 236-245, September 2007