Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 50, Issue 5 , Pages 601-607, November 2007

Rapid Fluid Resuscitation in Pediatrics: Testing the American College of Critical Care Medicine Guideline

Presented as an abstract at the 2006 Society of Critical Care Medicine Annual Congress, January 2006, San Francisco, CA.

  • Michael J. Stoner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Section of Emergency Medicine, Columbus Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH
  • ,
  • Deborah G. Goodman, RN

      Affiliations

    • Section of Emergency Medicine, Columbus Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH
  • ,
  • Daniel M. Cohen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Section of Emergency Medicine, Columbus Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH
  • ,
  • Soledad A. Fernandez, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • ,
  • Mark W. Hall, MD

      Affiliations

    • Section of Critical Care Medicine, Columbus Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH
    • Columbus Children’s Research Institute, Columbus, OH
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Mark W. Hall, MD, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Columbus Children’s Hospital, 700 Children’s Drive, Columbus, OH 43205; 614-722-3437, fax 614-722-3443

Received 26 December 2006; received in revised form 24 April 2007 and 23 May 2007; accepted 25 June 2007. published online 31 August 2007.

Study objective

The 2002 American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) guidelines for the resuscitation of pediatric septic shock suggest that 20 mL/kg of bolus intravenous fluid be given within 5 minutes. Of 3 commonly used, inexpensive methods of fluid delivery, we hypothesized that only use of a manual push-pull system will permit guideline adherence.

Methods

This prospective, interventional study was open to children in the Columbus Children’s Hospital Emergency Department who were ordered a 20 mL/kg nonemergent fluid bolus by their treating physician. Subjects were randomized to receive the fluid for 5 minutes by a pressure bag maintained at 300 mm Hg, by a manual push-pull system, or by gravity. Volume of fluid delivered, absolute rates of fluid delivery, and adherence to the ACCM guideline were recorded. Statistical analysis was done with both parametric and nonparametric methods.

Results

Sixty children were enrolled, with 57 included in data analysis. Median volumes of fluid delivered in the study period were 20.9 mL/kg (pressure bag), 20.2 mL/kg (push-pull), and 6.2 mL/kg (gravity) (P<.0001). The ACCM guideline was met in 58% of the pressure bag group, 68% of the push-pull group, and none of the gravity group. No children weighing greater than 40 kg met the guideline in any of the groups.

Conclusion

The ACCM guideline for rapid fluid resuscitation is feasible for many children, especially those weighing less than 40 kg. Contrary to our hypothesis, the use of a pressure bag and a manual push-pull system both appear to be acceptable methods of rapid fluid delivery. Administration of bolus fluid by gravity likely has a limited role in acute pediatric resuscitation.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Kathy N. Shaw, MD, MSCEAuthor contributions: MJS and MWH conceived of the study. MJS, DGG, DMC, and MWH designed the study. MJS and DGG recruited subjects and collected data. MJS, MWH, and DMC performed data analysis. MJS and MWH drafted the article, with substantial contributions to its revision from DGG and DMC. SAF performed additional statistical analyses and provided substantial contributions to the article revision. MWH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. This study was funded in part by NICHD K12HD43372-03, NHLBI K08HL085525-01.Publication dates: Available online August 30, 2007.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(07)01251-6

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.06.482

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 50, Issue 5 , Pages 601-607, November 2007