Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 57, Issue 3 , Pages 248-256.e4, March 2011

Examining Effectiveness of Medical Interpreters in Emergency Departments for Spanish-Speaking Patients With Limited English Proficiency: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Ann D. Bagchi, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Health, Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Ann D. Bagchi, PhD, Mathematica Policy Research, 600 Alexander Park, Princeton, NJ 08540; 609-716-4554, fax 609-799-0005
  • ,
  • Stacy Dale, MPA

      Affiliations

    • Division of Health, Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ
  • ,
  • Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Health, Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Sky Andrecheck, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Health, Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Kathleen Zavotsky, MS, RN

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Department, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ
  • ,
  • Robert Eisenstein, MD

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Department, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ

Received 4 January 2010; received in revised form 27 April 2010; accepted 25 May 2010. published online 05 August 2010.

Study objectives

This study examines whether availability of in-person professional interpreter services during emergency department (ED) visits affects satisfaction of limited English proficient patients and their health providers, using a randomized controlled trial.

Methods

We randomized time blocks during which in-person professional interpreters were available to Spanish-speaking patients in the EDs of 2 central New Jersey hospitals. We assessed the intervention's effects on patient and provider satisfaction through a multilevel regression model that accounted for the nesting of patients within time blocks and controlled for the patient's age and sex, hospital, and when the visit occurred (weekday or weekend).

Results

During the 7-month intake period, 242 patients were enrolled during 101 treatment time blocks and 205 patients were enrolled during 100 control time blocks. Regression-adjusted results indicate that 96% of treatment group patients were “very satisfied” (on a 5-point Likert scale) with their ability to communicate during the visit compared with 24% of control group patients (odds ratio=72; 95% confidence interval 31 to 167). (Among control group members who were not very satisfied, responses ranged from “very dissatisfied” to “somewhat satisfied.”) Similarly, physicians, triage nurses, and discharge nurses were more likely to be very satisfied with communication during treatment time blocks than during control time blocks. We did not assess acuity of illness or global measures of satisfaction.

Conclusion

Use of in-person, professionally trained medical interpreters significantly increases Spanish-speaking limited English proficient patients' and their health providers' satisfaction with communication during ED visits.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.

 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.

 Supervising editor: Donald M. Yealy, MD

 Author contributions: ADB, SD, and NV-S conceived the study, designed the trial, and obtained research funding. ADB recruited participating hospitals and oversaw recruitment of field staff and interviewers. ADB, KZ, and RE completed institutional review board applications and reporting. ADB, SD, and KZ supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection. NV-S carried out randomization procedures and led statistical analyses, with assistance from SD and SA. ADB had primary responsibility for drafting the article, with all authors contributing substantially to the original draft and subsequent revisions. ADB takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. This project was funded under grant number 55879 by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

 Please see page 249 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

 Publication date: Available online August 3, 2010.

PII: S0196-0644(10)00557-3

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.032

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 57, Issue 3 , Pages 248-256.e4, March 2011