“Sign Right Here and You're Good to Go”: A Content Analysis of Audiotaped Emergency Department Discharge Instructions
Study objective
The goal of this study is to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the quality and content of verbal discharge instructions at 2 emergency departments (EDs).
Methods
This was a secondary data analysis of 844 ED audiotapes collected during a study of patient–emergency provider communication at 1 urban and 1 suburban ED. ED visits of nonemergency adult female patients were recorded with a digital audiotape. Of 844 recorded ED visits, 477 (57%) audiotapes captured audible discharge instructions suitable for analysis. Audiotapes were double coded for the following discharge content: (1) explanation of illness, (2) expected course, (3) self-care, (4) medication instructions, (5) symptoms prompting return to the ED, (6) time-specified for follow-up visit, (7) follow-up care instructions, (8) opportunities for questions, and (9) patient confirmation of understanding. Analysis included descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, 2-sample t tests, and logistic regression models.
Results
Four hundred seventy-seven of 871 (55%) patient tapes contained audible discharge instructions. The majority of discharges were conducted by the primary provider (emergency physician or nurse practitioner). Ninety-one percent of discharges included some opportunity to ask questions, although most of these were minimal. Only 22% of providers confirmed patients' understanding of instructions.
Conclusion
Verbal ED discharge instructions are often incomplete, and most patients are given only minimal opportunities to ask questions or confirm understanding.
Please see page 316 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supervising editor: Robert L. Wears, MD, MS
Author contributions: KVR conceived the study design, obtained research funding, designed the data abstraction forms, and supervised data collection, data analysis, and interpretation of the data. AV and KVR framed the research questions and contributed to the drafting and critical revision of the article. AV conducted the chart review and literature search. KVR takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. This project was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality R01 HS11096. The senior author, Dr. Rhodes, was also supported by NIMH K23 MH64572.
Reprints not available from the authors.
Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
Publication date: Available online October 29, 2010.
PII: S0196-0644(10)01426-5
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.024
© 2010 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
