Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 190-197, February 2010

Methamphetamine Body Stuffers: An Observational Case Series

  • Patrick L. West, MD

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
    • Oregon Poison Center, Portland, OR
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Patrick L. West, MD, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, CB 550, Portland, OR 97239
  • ,
  • Nathanael J. McKeown, DO

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
    • Oregon Poison Center, Portland, OR
    • Portland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Portland, OR
  • ,
  • Robert G. Hendrickson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
    • Oregon Poison Center, Portland, OR

Received 18 March 2009; received in revised form 30 June 2009, 5 August 2009 and 6 August 2009; accepted 10 August 2009. published online 12 October 2009.

Study objective

We describe the demographics, characteristics, treatment, and clinical course of methamphetamine body stuffers. We also determine the clinical characteristics of methamphetamine body stuffers who have severe outcomes.

Methods

A 6.5-year descriptive nonconcurrent observational case series evaluated methamphetamine body stuffers about whom the Oregon Poison Center was consulted by their primary physicians. Poison center charts were supplemented by completed hospital charts (for 95% of patients).

Results

Six hundred forty-eight patients with methamphetamine exposure were identified and reviewed, and 55 charts met the criteria for “methamphetamine body stuffer.” We found the following characteristics of methamphetamine body stuffers: mean age 29 years (range 16 to 57 years), men in 44 of 55 cases (80%), mean time to arrival 2.7 hours after ingestion, with a median of 1 hour after ingestion. Ninety-seven percent (53/55) stuffed methamphetamine orally (2/55 rectally). Methamphetamine was most frequently swallowed in baggies, but 25% were unpackaged. The median dose ingested was 3.5 g of methamphetamine in 1 package. Outcome-based analysis revealed 29% (16/55) of patients had severe outcomes, as defined by end-organ toxicity, with agitation requiring intubation the most common severe outcome. There was 1 death reported. Toxicity did not appear to be related to the amount of methamphetamine or number of packets. Patients with severe outcomes had higher mean initial pulse rates and temperatures. Eighty-eight percent (14/16) of patients with severe outcomes had a presenting pulse rate greater than 120 beats/min or a temperature greater than 38°C versus 18% (7/39) patients with a benign outcome. Twenty-four radiographic studies were obtained; none detected packets.

Conclusion

Methamphetamine body stuffers have similar demographics to those of body stuffers of other stimulants, but tended to ingest fewer baggies with larger masses, and had a higher percentage of severe outcomes (29%) than previously reported with other stimulants. Increases in presenting pulse rate and temperature (pulse rate >120 beats/min or >38.0°C) are common in patients who will develop end-organ damage.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Please see page 191 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

 Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.

 Supervising editor: E. Martin Caravati, MD, MPH

 Author contributions: PLW and RGH designed the study, conducted data collection and analysis, and drafted the article. PLW and NJM conducted statistical analysis. PLW, NJM, and RGH conducted other analyses and edited the article. PLW was responsible for charts and graphs. PLW, NJM, and RGH take responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.

 Publication date: Available online October 10, 2009.

PII: S0196-0644(09)01430-9

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.08.005

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 190-197, February 2010