Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 37, Issue 6 , Pages 609-615, June 2001

Can an out-of-hospital cervical spine clearance protocol identify all patients with injuries? An argument for selective immobilization☆☆

Abstract presented at the California American College of Emergency Physicians’ Scientific Assembly, San Diego, CA, June 1999.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center, Fresno, CA.

Received 18 May 2000; received in revised form 22 December 2000; accepted 21 January 2001.

Abstract 

Study objective: We sought to determine the sensitivity of the Fresno/Kings/Madera emergency medical services (EMS) selective spine immobilization protocol in identifying patients with potential cervical injuries. We also sought to determine whether the protocol was safe in the out-of-hospital setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients discharged from 5 trauma-receiving hospitals in Fresno County with the diagnosis of cervical spine injury between July 1, 1990, and June 30, 1996. All of these patients transported to the hospital by EMS personnel were selected for the study group. Medical records of those patients not immobilized were further investigated to identify protocol violations or deficiencies. Results: There were 861 patients with significant cervical injuries during this time span. EMS personnel brought 504 patients to the hospital, of which 495 arrived in cervical spine immobilization. Of the remaining 9 patients, 2 refused immobilization, and 2 could not be immobilized; 3 injuries were missed by the protocol criteria, and 2 injuries were missed because of protocol violations. Of these last 5 patients, 1 patient had an adverse outcome, 2 injuries were considered unstable, 4 patients were older than 67 years, and one patient was 9 months old. Conclusion: The Fresno/Kings/Madera EMS selective spine immobilization protocol is 99% (95% CI, 97.7% to 99.7%) sensitive in identifying patients with cervical injuries for immobilization. Those patients not identified were at extremes of age. These results suggest that selective immobilization may be safely applied in the out-of-hospital setting but should be used with caution at extremes of age. [Stroh G, Braude D. Can an out-of-hospital cervical spine clearance protocol identify all patients with injuries? An argument for selective immobilization. Ann Emerg Med. June 2001;37:609-615.]

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr. Braude was a resident in Fresno at the time of the study. He is now with the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.

☆☆ Address for reprints: Geoffrey Stroh, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center, 445 S. Cedar Avenue, Fresno, CA 93702; 559-459-5105, fax, 559-459-3844; E-mail geoffrey.stroh@ucsfresno.edu.

PII: S0196-0644(01)38327-0

doi:10.1067/mem.2001.114409

Refers to article:

  • Out-of-hospital cervical spine immobilization: Making policy in the absence of definitive information

    J.R. Hoffman, W.R. Mower
    Annals of Emergency Medicine June 2001 (Vol. 37, Issue 6, Pages 632-634)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 37, Issue 6 , Pages 609-615, June 2001