Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 20-27, January 2001

A randomized clinical trial of continuous-flow nitrous oxide and midazolam for sedation of young children during laceration repair

Presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies’ annual meeting, New Orleans, LA, May 1998, and at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine annual meeting, Chicago, IL, May 1998.

From the Division of Emergency Medicine,* the Department of Psychology, and the Division of Biostatistics,§ Washington University School of Medicine, and St. Louis Children’s Hospital, St. Louis, MO

Received 26 July 1999; received in revised form 27 March 2000, 27 July 2000 and 22 August 2000; accepted 29 September 2000.

Abstract 

Study Objective: To compare the efficacy and complication profile of oral midazolam therapy and continuous-flow 50% nitrous oxide in alleviating anxiety during laceration repair in children 2 to 6 years old. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial using 4 study groups who required laceration repair: (1) children who received standard care alone, which included comforting and topical anesthesia augmented with injected lidocaine if needed; (2) children who received standard care and oral midazolam; (3) children who received standard care and nitrous oxide; and (4) children who received standard care, oral midazolam, and nitrous oxide. Videotapes were blindly scored using the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (OSBD-R) to assess distress during baseline, wound cleaning, lidocaine injecting, suturing, and recovery. Adverse effects were noted during suturing and by parent questionnaires completed 24 hours after suturing and at suture removal. OSBD-R data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Adverse effect data were analyzed using categorical models. Results: Two hundred four subjects were enrolled (midazolam plus nitrous oxide 52, midazolam 51, nitrous oxide 51, standard care 50; mean patient age was 4.1 years; 66% were boys). Mean OSBD-R scores were lower for groups that received nitrous oxide during wound cleaning by 2.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 3.2), lidocaine injecting by 2.5 points (95% CI 1.4 to 3.5), and suturing by 2.9 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.9). Adverse effects occurred more frequently, and recovery times were longer for groups that received midazolam. Conclusion: For facial suturing in 2- to 6-year-old children, regimens including continuous-flow nitrous oxide were more effective in reducing distress, and had fewer adverse effects and shorter recovery times than midazolam. [Luhmann JD, Kennedy RM, Porter FL, Miller JP, Jaffe DM. A randomized clinical trial of continuous-flow nitrous oxide and midazolam for sedation of young children during laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med. January 2001;37:20-27.]

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Address for reprints: Jan D. Luhmann, MD, St. Louis Children’s Hospital, One Children’s Place, Room 4S50, St. Louis, MO 63110, 314-454-2341, fax 314-454-4345, E-mail luhmann_j@kids.wustl.edu .

PII: S0196-0644(01)56352-0

doi:10.1067/mem.2001.112003

Refers to article:

  • Continuous-flow nitrous oxide: Searching for the ideal procedural anxiolytic for toddlers

    Baruch Krauss
    Annals of Emergency Medicine January 2001 (Vol. 37, Issue 1, Pages 61-62)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 37, Issue 1 , Pages 20-27, January 2001