« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 40, Issue 3
, Pages 334-337
, September 2002
The effect of dedicated methodology and statistical review on published manuscript quality
References
- . Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:323–328
- . Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA. 2002;287:2847–2850
- Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:11–21
- . Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature. JAMA. 1994;272:101–104
- . Is the statistical assessment of papers submitted to the British Medical Journal effective?. BMJ. 1983;286:1485–1488
- The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: a content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:329–333
☆ Author contributions: All of the authors participated in the conceptualization of the study. DLS, RJC, and RLW scored the manuscripts and the reviews. DLS and RJC performed the data analysis. DLS and JFW drafted the manuscript. All authors participated in preparation of the final draft. DLS takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
☆☆ Reprints not available from the authors. Address for correspondence: David L. Schriger, MD, MPH, UCLA Emergency Medicine Center, 924 Westwood Boulevard, #300, Los Angeles, CA 90024; 310-794-0593, fax 310-794-0599; E-mail schriger@ucla.edu.
PII: S0196-0644(02)00049-5
doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.127328
© 2002 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 40, Issue 3
, Pages 334-337
, September 2002
