* ‡; Daniel W. Ochsenschlager, MD* ‡ §; James M. Chamberlain, MD* ‡ §">
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 159-163 (February 2002)


View previous. 6 of 31 View next.

Analysis of pediatric hospitalizations after emergency department release as a quality improvement tool☆☆

Andrew D. DePiero, MD* ‡, Daniel W. Ochsenschlager, MD* ‡ §, James M. Chamberlain, MD* ‡ §

Received 23 August 2000; received in revised form 11 November 2000 and 4 April 2001; accepted 16 April 2001.

Refers to article:
Rapid process redesign in a university-based emergency department: Decreasing waiting time intervals and improving patient satisfaction
Daniel W. Spaite, Fran Bartholomeaux, John Guisto, Elizabeth Lindberg, Becky Hull, Alicia Eyherabide, Sally Lanyon, Elizabeth A. Criss, Terence D. Valenzuela, Carol Conroy
Annals of Emergency Medicine
February 2002 (Vol. 39, Issue 2, Pages 168-177)
Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (111 KB)

Abstract 

Study Objective: We characterize repeat pediatric emergency department visits and determine the cause for such visits as an indicator of potential need for quality improvement. We hypothesized that most repeat ED visits resulting in hospitalization do not represent medical errors. Methods: The study was performed at a large, tertiary care, academic children's hospital. Patients who returned to the ED within 72 hours of a previous visit were identified by computerized registration data. The charts of these patients were then reviewed by a member of the ED medical staff to identify factors from the initial visit that contributed to the return visit. A multidisciplinary committee then reviewed each case until consensus was achieved regarding the cause for the repeat visit. In this study, we analyzed the quality improvement decisions from a 12-month period. Results: Over a 12-month period, during which there were a total of 51,195 visits, 285 (0.56%) patients were hospitalized after a repeat visit. The repeat visit was determined to be unrelated to the first visit in 12 (4.2%) patients. In 12 (4.2%) cases, the cause for repeat visit and hospitalization could not be determined. This resulted in a total of 261 patients for analysis. In 234 (90.0%) patients, the return visit was determined to be a result of the progression of illness (no medical error). Ten (3.8%) patients had a missed diagnosis, whereas 2 (0.8%) patients had errors in their treatment (likely medical error). An incomplete workup was cited in 7 (2.7%) patients (potential medical error). Parenting factors (refusing admission, not filling prescriptions, not giving prescribed medications) were noted in 5 (1.9%) cases. Three (1.1%) patients did not follow up with appropriate subspecialists. Conclusion: The overall rate of repeat visits resulting in hospitalization is small. In the majority of these cases (90.0%), the ED evaluation was appropriate and the admission was for progression of the patient's illness. Given the small number of patients and the infrequency of missed diagnoses, this may not be an efficient method for assessing ED performance. [DePiero AD, Ochsenschlager DW, Chamberlain JM. Analysis of pediatric hospitalizations after emergency department release as a quality improvement tool. Ann Emerg Med. February 2002;39:159-163.]

From the Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine,* Children's National Medical Center; and the Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine,§ George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC

 Author contributions are provided at the end of this article.

☆☆ Address for reprints: Andrew D. DePiero, MD, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20010; 202-884-4177,fax 202-884-3573; E-mail,adepiero@cnmc.org .

PII: S0196-0644(02)42924-1

doi:10.1067/mem.2002.116595


View previous. 6 of 31 View next.