Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 2 , Pages 292-297, August 2003

Interval likelihood ratios: Another advantage for the evidence-based diagnostician☆☆

Grand Rapids MERC/Michigan State University Program in Emergency Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI (Brown), and the Department of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (Reeves)

Received 2 October 2002; received in revised form 12 January 2003 and 6 February 2003; accepted 11 February 2003.

Address for correspondence: Michael D. Brown, MD, Emergency Medicine, Spectrum Health-Butterworth, 100 Michigan Avenue, NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503; 616-391-3588, fax 616-391-3674; E-mail brownm@msu.edu.

Abstract 

Emergency physicians are often confronted with making diagnostic decisions on the basis of a test result represented on a continuous scale. When the results of continuous data are expressed as binary outcomes using a single cutoff, loss of information and distortion may occur. In this setting, interval likelihood ratios provide a distinct advantage in interpretation over those based on a dichotomized sensitivity and specificity. Dividing the data into intervals uses more of the information contained in the data and allows the clinician to more appropriately interpret the test results and to make valid clinical decisions. This article illustrates the advantages of interval likelihood ratios with examples and demonstrates how to calculate them on the basis of different data formats. Authors and journals need to be encouraged to report the results of studies of performance of diagnostic tests using interval ranges rather than simple dichotomization when the tests involve continuous variables. [Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:292-297.]

 

 The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.

☆☆ Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(03)00401-3

doi:10.1067/mem.2003.274

Refers to article:

  • The problem with sensitivity and specificity…

    E.John Gallagher
    Annals of Emergency Medicine August 2003 (Vol. 42, Issue 2, Pages 298-303)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 2 , Pages 292-297, August 2003