Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 2 , Pages 292-297 , August 2003

Interval likelihood ratios: Another advantage for the evidence-based diagnostician

Received 2 October 2002 ,Revised 6 February 2003 ,Accepted 11 February 2003.

References 

  1. Hayden S, Brown M. Likelihood ratio: a powerful tool for incorporating the results of a diagnostic test into clinical decisionmaking. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:575–580
  2. Choi BC. Slopes of a receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratios for a diagnostic test. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:1127–1132
  3. Gallagher E. Clinical utility of likelihood ratios. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;31:391–397
  4. Tandberg D, Deely JJ, O'Malley AJ. Generalized likelihood ratios for quantitative diagnostic test scores: slopes of a receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratios for a diagnostic test. Am J Emerg Med. 1997;15:694–699
  5. Andersson RE, Hugander AP, Ghazi SH, et al.  Diagnostic value of disease history, clinical presentation, and inflammatory parameters of appendicitis. World J Surg. 1999;23:133–140
  6. Snyder BK, Hayden SR. Accuracy of leukocyte count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:565–574
  7. Dujardin B, Van den Ende J, Van Gompel A, et al.  Likelihood ratios: a real improvement for clinical decision making?. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994;10:29–36
  8. Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:763–770
  9. Harrison A, Morrison LK, Krishnaswamy P, et al.  B-type natriuretic peptide predicts future cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:131–138
  10. Pulliam PN, Attia MW, Cronan KM. C-reactive protein in febrile children 1 to 36 months of age with clinically undetectable serious bacterial infection. Pediatrics. 2001;108:1275–1279
  11. Fagan TJ. Nomogram for Bayes theorem [letter]. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:257

 The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.

☆☆ Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(03)00401-3

doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.274

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 2 , Pages 292-297 , August 2003