Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 43, Issue 3 , Pages 354-361, March 2004

Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in blunt trauma patients with out-of-hospital or emergency department hypotension

  • James F Holmes, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California–Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of California–Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: James F. Holmes, MD, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California–Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Boulevard, PSSB, Sacramento, CA 95817-2282; 916-734-1539, fax 916-734-7950
  • ,
  • Dawn Harris, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California–Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of California–Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Felix D Battistella, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of California–Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA

Received 29 May 2003; received in revised form 10 September 2003; accepted 12 September 2003.

Abstract 

Study objectives

We determine the test performance of abdominal ultrasonography for detecting hemoperitoneum in blunt trauma patients with out-of-hospital or emergency department (ED) hypotension.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of all blunt trauma patients hospitalized at a Level I trauma center. Patients were included if they were older than 6 years and had out-of-hospital or ED hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg) and underwent ED ultrasonography. The initial interpretation of the abdominal ultrasonography was recorded, including the presence or absence of intraperitoneal fluid and the specific location of such fluid. Presence or absence of intra-abdominal injury was determined by abdominal computed tomography scan, laparotomy, or clinical follow-up.

Results

Four hundred forty-seven patients with a mean age of 36.0±17.5 years were enrolled. One hundred forty-eight (33%) patients had intra-abdominal injuries, and 116 (78%) of these patients had hemoperitoneum. Abdominal ultrasonography had the following test performance for detecting patients with intra-abdominal injury and hemoperitoneum: sensitivity 92/116 (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 71% to 86%), specificity 316/331 (95%; 95% CI 93% to 97%), positive predictive value 92/107 (86%; 95% CI 78% to 92%), and negative predictive value 316/340 (93%; 95% CI 90% to 95%). The positive likelihood ratio was 15.8, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.22. One hundred five (91%) of the 116 patients with intra-abdominal injuries and hemoperitoneum underwent a therapeutic laparotomy. Abdominal ultrasonography demonstrated intraperitoneal fluid in 87 (sensitivity 83%; 95% CI 74% to 90%) of these 105 patients.

Conclusion

Of patients with out-of-hospital or ED hypotension, abdominal ultrasonography identifies most patients with hemoperitoneum and intra-abdominal injuries. Hypotensive patients with negative abdominal ultrasonography results, however, must be further evaluated for sources of their hypotension, including additional abdominal evaluation, once they are hemodynamically stabilized.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Author contributions: JFH and DH conceived the study. JFH developed its design. JFH, DH, and FDB acquired the data; DH managed the data; and JFH analyzed and interpreted the data. JFH and FDB drafted the manuscript. All authors take responsibility for the paper as a whole.Presented at the American College of Emergency Physicians Research Forum, Seattle, WA, October 2002.The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(03)00983-1

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.09.011

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 43, Issue 3 , Pages 354-361, March 2004