Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 43, Issue 3 , Pages 376-381, March 2004

Emergency contraception:

What do our patients know?

  • Jean Abbott, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Jean Abbott, MD, B-215, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East 9th Avenue, Denver, CO 80262
  • ,
  • Kim M Feldhaus, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
  • ,
  • Debra Houry, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Denver Health Emergency Medicine Residency, Denver, CO, USA
    • Dr. Houry is currently affiliated with the Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  • ,
  • Steven R Lowenstein, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA
    • Departments of Emergency Medicine, Medicine and Preventive Medicine/Biometrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA

Received 28 July 2003; received in revised form 1 October 2003; accepted 23 October 2003.

Abstract 

Study objective

Unintended pregnancy is a major medical, social, and public health problem. Emergency contraceptive pills can prevent 75% to 85% of unintended pregnancies if administered within 72 hours of intercourse. We perform this study to measure knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceived needs about emergency contraception in a sample of women seeking emergency department (ED) care.

Methods

This was a prospective survey of women presenting to an inner-city ED during an 8-week study period. Women who were aged 18 to 45 years, English speaking, and not critically ill and who presented during 56 randomly generated 4-hour time blocks were eligible. Trained research assistants administered a 20-question survey that included questions on current sexual and contraceptive practices and knowledge, acceptance, and preferences about postcoital contraception.

Results

Two hundred thirty-two women met eligibility criteria; 158 (68%) women agreed to participate. Participants and nonparticipants were similar in age, race, ethnicity, and insurance status. The participants' mean age was 30 years. Twenty-five percent were married, whereas 49% had never married and 25% were separated or divorced. Fifty-two percent (95% confidence interval [CI] 44% to 60%) reported at least 1 previous unintended pregnancy; 28% (95% CI 21% to 35%) had 1 or more previous elective abortions. Of women who had been sexually active in the past month, half (47%) reported unprotected intercourse during that time. Among all respondents, 122 (77%; 95% CI 71% to 84%) had heard of emergency contraception as a way of preventing pregnancy after unprotected intercourse. Of these respondents, one fourth to one half did not have enough knowledge to use emergency contraceptive pills effectively. Fifty-seven percent of women were willing to use emergency contraceptive pills in the future, and 16 women said they would consider a change in regular contraception to emergency contraceptive pills if widely available.

Conclusion

Sexually active women seeking ED care have high rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion. There is broad acceptance of emergency contraceptive pills to prevent pregnancy, but knowledge of availability, timing, and proper use is limited. Emergency contraceptive pills are a safe, effective, and low-cost primary preventive and emergency care intervention, and information about their use should be made available to ED patients. Patients should be advised not to abandon their use of barrier or other traditional contraceptives.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Author contributions: JA, KMF, and DH conceived the study and designed the trial, with design advice from SRL. KMF and DH supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection, institutional review board approval, and managing of the data, including quality control. SRL provided statistical advice on study design. KMF and JA analyzed the data. JA drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. JA takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.Presented at the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine annual meeting, St. Louis, MO, May 2002.The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(03)01120-X

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.039

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 43, Issue 3 , Pages 376-381, March 2004