« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 43, Issue 2
, Pages 278-290
, February 2004
Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute blunt abdominal trauma
References
- References
- Unrecognized abdominal trauma in patients with head injury. Ann Surg. 1965;161:608–612 [III]
- Admission or observation is not necessary after a negative abdominal computed tomographic scan in patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial. J Trauma. 1998;44:273–283 [II]
- Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Surgery. 1965;57:633–637 [III]
- Computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. Arch Surg. 1989;124:344–347 [III]
- The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of blunt small-bowel perforation. Am J Surg. 1994;168:670–675 [III]
-
.
Computed tomography: an unreliable indicator of pancreatic trauma.
Am Surgeon. 1996;62:647–651
[III]
-
Acute rupture of the diaphragm due to blunt trauma: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CT.
AJR. 1996;166:1035–1039
[III]
- . Prospective comparison of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, computed tomographic scanning, and ultrasonography for the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1993;35:267–270 [II]
- Oral contrast solution and computed tomography for blunt abdominal trauma. Arch Surg. 1999;134:622–627 [II]
- Sonography in blunt abdominal trauma: a preliminary progress report. J Trauma. 1992;33:39–43 [II]
- . The origins, benefits, harms, and implications of emergency medicine clinical policies. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:597–602 [III]
-
Performance of CT in detection of bowel injury.
AJR. 2001;176:129–135
[III]
- Helical computed tomography of bowel and mesenteric injuries. J Trauma. 2001;51:26–36 [III]
- Diagnostic accuracy of helical CT for detection of blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries. Clinical Radiology. 1998;53:193–197 [III]
- . Current diagnostic approaches lack sensitivity in the diagnosis of perforated blunt small bowel injury: analysis of 275,557 trauma admissions from the EAST multi-institutional HVI trial. J Trauma. 2003;54:295–306 [II]
-
.
Helical CT of abdominal trauma.
Rad Clin North Am. 1999;33:591–612
[III]
- Effect of oral contrast administration for abdominal computed tomography in the evaluation of acute blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30:7–13 [III]
- Oral contrast is not necessary in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma by computed tomography. Am J Surg. 1993;166:680–685 [II]
- Abdominal trauma: use of oral contrast material for CT is safe. Radiology. 1997;205:91–93 [II]
- Experience with over 2,500 diagnostic peritoneal lavages. Injury. 2000;31:479–482 [III]
- Prospective analysis of a rapid trauma ultrasound examination performed by emergency physicians. J Trauma. 1995;38:879–885 [I]
- Surgeon-performed ultrasound for the assessment of truncal injuries. Lessons learned from 1,540 patients. Ann Surg. 1998;228:557–567 [II]
- Focused abdominal sonogram for trauma: the learning curve of nonradiologist clinicians in detecting hemoperitoneum. J Trauma. 1999;46:553–564 [I]
- Institutional learning curve of surgeon-performed trauma ultrasound. Arch Surg. 1998;133:530–536 [III]
- Bowel and mesenteric injury: evaluation with emergency abdominal ultrasound. Radiology. 1999;211:399–403 [II]
- . The value of physical examination in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study. Injury. 1997;28:261–265 [III]
- Speed and efficiency in the resuscitation of blunt trauma patients with multiple injuries: the advantage of diagnostic peritoneal lavage over abdominal computerized tomography. J Trauma. 1998;44:287–290 [III]
- Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: accuracy in predicting necessary laparotomy following blunt and penetrating trauma. J Trauma. 1990;30:1345–1355 [III]
- . Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: integration with clinical information to improve diagnostic performance. J Trauma. 1992;32:52–57 [III]
-
.
The diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract injuries resulting from blunt trauma.
Aust NZ J Surg. 1999;69:770–777
[III]
- Open versus closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a comparison on safety, rapidity, efficacy. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998;43:235–238 [III]
- . Open or closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage for abdominal trauma? A meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2000;48:1091–1095 [II]
- Randomized, prospective comparison of open and closed peritoneal lavage for abdominal trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:1290–1292 [II]
- . Is closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage contraindicated in patients with previous abdominal surgery?. Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4:287–290 [II]
- New diagnostic peritoneal lavage criteria for diagnosis of intestinal injury. J Trauma. 1998;44:991–999
- . Cell count ratio: new criterion of diagnostic peritoneal lavage for detection of hollow organ perforation. J Trauma. 1998;45:540–544 [III]
- Delayed diagnosis of blunt duodenal injury: an avoidable complication. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:393–399 [III]
-
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage as an indicator for therapeutic surgery.
CJS. 1991;34:471–476
[III]
- Survey of abdominal ultrasound and diagnostic peritoneal lavage for suspected intraabdominal injury following blunt trauma. Injury. 1998;29:65–71 [III]
- . Diagnostic evaluation of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a decision analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:385–396 [III]
- . Seventy cases of injuries of the small intestine caused by blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study from 1970 to 1994. J Trauma. 1999;46:116–121 [III]
- . Dilemmas in the diagnosis of blunt enteric trauma. Am Surg. 1998;64:750–754 [III]
- Computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Am Surg. 1992;58:44–58 [III]
- Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Limited indications due to evolving concepts in trauma care. Am Surg. 1991;57:126–128 [III]
- Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma victims. Eur J Emerg Med. 1998;5:231–234 [II]
- . Unnecessary laparotomies for trauma: a prospective study of morbidity. J Trauma. 1995;38:350–356 [II]
- Evaluation of a diagnostic protocol using screening diagnostic peritoneal lavage with selective use of abdominal computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1999;46:847–852 [III]
☆ Policy statements and clinical policies are the official policies of the American College of Emergency Physicians and, as such, are not subject to the same peer review process as articles appearing in the journal. Policy statements and clinical policies of ACEP do not necessarily reflect the policies and beliefs of Annals of Emergency Medicine and its editors.This clinical policy was developed by the ACEP Clinical Policies Committee and the Clinical Policies Subcommittee on Acute Blunt Abdominal Trauma. For a complete listing of subcommittee and committee members, please see page 283.Approved by the ACEP Board of Directors October 9, 2003.This clinical policy was developed by the ACEP Clinical Policies Committee and the Clinical Policies Subcommittee on Acute Blunt Abdominal Trauma.Members of the Clinical Policies Subcommittee on Acute Blunt Abdominal Trauma included:John M. Howell, MD, ChairB. Tilman Jolly, MDThomas W. Lukens, MD, PhDRoland Clayton Merchant, MDMembers of the Clinical Policies Committee included:William C. Dalsey, MD (Chair, 2000-2002, Co-Chair 2002-2003)Andy S. Jagoda, MD (Co-Chair 2002-2003)Wyatt W. Decker, MDFrancis M. Fesmire, MDSteven A. Godwin, MDJohn M. Howell, MDAlan H. Itzkowitz, MD (EMRA Representative 2000-2001)Shkelzen Hoxhaj, MD (EMRA Representative 2002-2003)J. Stephen Huff, MDEdwin K. Kuffner, MDThomas W. Lukens, MD, PhDBenjamin E. Marett, RN, MSN, CEN, CNA, COHN-S (ENA Representative 2001-2003)Thomas P. Martin, MDJessie Moore, RN, MSN, CEN (ENA Representative 2000-2001)Barbara A. Murphy, MDDevorah Nazarian, MDScott M. Silvers, MDBonnie Simmons, DOEdward P. Sloan, MD, MPHRobert L. Wears, MD, MSStephen J. Wolf, MD (EMRA Representative 2001-2002)Robert E. Suter, DO, MHA (Board Liaison 2000-2001)Susan M. Nedza, MD, MBA (Board Liaison 2001-2003)Rhonda R. Whitson, RHIA, Staff Liaison, Clinical Policies Committee and Subcommittees
PII: S0196-0644(03)01130-2
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.045
« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 43, Issue 2
, Pages 278-290
, February 2004
