Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 44, Issue 3 , Pages 253-261, September 2004

Health care facility and community strategies for patient care surge capacity☆☆

From the University of Minnesota and Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN (Hick); Emergency Management and Disaster Medicine, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA (Hanfling); George Washington University, Washington, DC (Hanfling, Barbisch); Emergency Preparedness and Response Program, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, and Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Burstein); Institute for Public Health Emergency Readiness, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (DeAtley); Army War College Strategic Studies Institute and Global Deterrence Alternatives, Washington, DC (Barbisch); Denver Metropolitan Medical Response System and Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center–Denver Health, Denver, CO (Bogdan); and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, and Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver, CO (Cantrill) USA

Received 2 March 2004; received in revised form 30 March 2004; accepted 16 April 2004. published online 19 August 2004.

Abstract 

Recent terrorist and epidemic events have underscored the potential for disasters to generate large numbers of casualties. Few surplus resources to accommodate these casualties exist in our current health care system. Plans for “surge capacity” must thus be made to accommodate a large number of patients. Surge planning should allow activation of multiple levels of capacity from the health care facility level to the federal level. Plans should be scalable and flexible to cope with the many types and varied timelines of disasters. Incident management systems and cooperative planning processes will facilitate maximal use of available resources. However, resource limitations may require implementation of triage strategies. Facility-based or “surge in place” solutions maximize health care facility capacity for patients during a disaster. When these resources are exceeded, community-based solutions, including the establishment of off-site hospital facilities, may be implemented. Selection criteria, logistics, and staffing of off-site care facilities is complex, and sample solutions from the United States, including use of local convention centers, prepackaged trailers, and state mental health and detention facilities, are reviewed. Proper pre-event planning and mechanisms for resource coordination are critical to the success of a response.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No grant or other funds supported the writing of this article. No products are mentioned in the article that the authors market or have investments in. Dr Barbisch is a principal in Global Deterrence Alternatives, which consults on issues such as these, but no recommendations within the paper support particular initiatives or products that are related to her venture.

☆☆ Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(04)00420-2

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.04.011

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 44, Issue 3 , Pages 253-261, September 2004