Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 45, Issue 1 , Pages 4-12, January 2005

Does lack of a usual source of care or health insurance increase the likelihood of an emergency department visit? Results of a national population-based study

From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Weber, Callaham); Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Showstack); and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ (Hunt, Colby)

Received 30 March 2004; received in revised form 15 June 2004; accepted 26 June 2004. published online 25 October 2004.

See editorial, p. 13.

Study objective

We determined whether having a usual source of care or health insurance is associated with the likelihood of an emergency department (ED) visit.

Methods

This was a multivariate analysis of the 2000 to 2001 nationally representative Community Tracking Study Household Survey to assess the independent association of usual source of care, health insurance, income, and health status with the likelihood of making 1 or more ED visits in the previous year.

Results

Based on a sample of 49,603 adults, an estimated 45.3 million adults reported 79.6 million ED visits in the previous year; 83.1% of these visitors identified a usual source of care other than an ED. Persons with poor physical health status made 48.4% of visits. Adults without a usual source of care were less likely to have had an ED visit than those whose usual source of care was a private physician (odds ratio [OR] 0.75). Uninsured individuals were no more likely to have an ED visit than insured individuals. Poor physical health (OR 2.41), poor mental health (OR 1.51), 5 or more outpatient visits during the year (OR 4.05), and changes in insurance coverage (OR 1.14) or usual source of care (OR 1.32) during the year were associated with an ED visit. Enrollment in a health maintenance organization and satisfaction with one's physician were not independently associated with ED use.

Conclusion

ED users are similar to nonusers with regard to health insurance and usual source of care but are more likely to be in poor health and have experienced disruptions in regular care. The success of efforts to decrease ED use may depend on improving delivery of outpatient care.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Author contributions: EJW, JAS, KAH, DCC, and MLC conceived the study, determined the theoretical model, and interpreted the results. EJW, JAS, and KAH designed the analyses. KAH and JAS provided statistical consultation; KAH programmed the data. EJW drafted the manuscript with contributions from JAS and KAH. All authors contributed substantially to its revision. EJW takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.The interpretations and opinions are those of the authors and may not necessarily reflect those of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation or the University of California, San Francisco.The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(04)01168-0

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.06.023

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 45, Issue 1 , Pages 4-12, January 2005