Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 44, Issue 6 , Pages 635-645, December 2004

An evaluation of portable high-efficiency particulate air filtration for expedient patient isolation in epidemic and emergency response

  • Kenneth Mead, MS, PE

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Kenneth Mead, MS, PE, Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4676 Columbia Parkway (MS R5), Cincinnati, OH 45226; 513-841-4385, fax 513-841-4506
  • ,
  • David L. Johnson, PhD, PE, CIH

From the Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH (Mead); and the Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (Johnson)

Received 15 March 2004; received in revised form 21 July 2004; accepted 29 July 2004. published online 25 October 2004.

Extraordinary incidents resulting in airborne infectious disease outbreaks could produce patient isolation requirements that exceed most hospitals' capacity. This article investigates expedient methods to establish airborne infection isolation areas using a commercially available portable filtration unit and common hardware supplies. The study was conducted within a conventional, nonisolation hospital room, and researchers evaluated several airborne isolation configurations that did not require building ventilation or structural modifications. A portable high-efficiency particulate air filtration unit and full-length plastic curtains established a “zone-within-zone” protective environment using local capture and directional airflows. The cost of constructing the expedient configurations was less than US$2,300 and required fewer than 3 person-hours to construct. A medical nebulizer aerosolized polystyrene latex microspheres to generate respirable condensation nuclei. Aerosol spectrometers sized and counted respirable particles at the source patient and health care worker positions and in areas outside the inner zone. The best-performing designs showed no measurable source migration out of the inner isolation zone and mean respirable particle counts up to 87% lower at the health care worker position(s) than those observed directly near the source patient location. Investigators conclude that with careful implementation under emergency circumstances in which engineered isolation rooms are unavailable, expedient methods can provide affordable and effective patient isolation while reducing exposure risks and potential disease transmission to health care workers, other patients, and visitors.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The research addressed in this manuscript was presented at the 2004 Public Health Professional Conference, May 16 to 20, Anchorage, AK.

 The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.

PII: S0196-0644(04)01210-7

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.07.451

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 44, Issue 6 , Pages 635-645, December 2004