The Australasian Clinical Toxicology Investigators Collaboration Randomized Trial of Different Loading Infusion Rates of N-Acetylcysteine
Study objective
We determine whether the incidence of adverse events caused by intravenous N-acetylcysteine is significantly less when the initial dose is infused over a 60-minute period compared with the standard infusion period of 15 minutes. A secondary objective is to assess the efficacy of the 2 treatment arms.
Methods
This was a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial of patients who presented with acetaminophen poisoning and who were treated with N-acetylcysteine and had no history of hypersensitivity to N-acetylcysteine. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the initial dose of N-acetylcysteine over a 15-minute or 60-minute period. Baseline signs and symptoms and adverse events were serially evaluated before and during administration of N-acetylcysteine. Tests of liver injury and coagulation were collected at baseline and then at 12-hour intervals.
Results
The study was designed with an 80% power to detect a halving of the incidence of adverse events. Of 180 evaluable patients, 109 patients were randomized to the 15-minute group and 71 patients were randomized to the 60-minute group. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 45% in the 15-minute group and 38% in the 60-minute group (95% confidence interval −8% to 22%). The study did not demonstrate a reduction of drug-related adverse outcomes with the 60-minute infusion. Incidence of maximum alanine aminotransferase levels indicating hepatotoxicity (serum level >1,000 IU/L) was 6.8% (5.6% for 15-minute, 8.7% for 60-minute). The difference did not attain statistical significance.
Conclusion
This study did not demonstrate a reduction of drug-related adverse outcomes with the 60-minute infusion. The study also confirmed that early treatment with N-acetylcysteine (within 8 hours of ingestion) is more effective than later treatment.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Author contributions: FK, AD, IMW, NB, LM, AG, and BC conceived the study, designed the trial, and helped obtain ethics approval in their respective centers. FK, AD, IMW, NB, LM, AG, and BC supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection. BT, AD, and IMW provided statistical advice on study design and helped analyze the data; FK drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. All authors take responsibility for the paper as a whole.Funding and support: The research study was not financially supported. After data collection, the statistical analysis was performed by CMAX, Institute of Drug Technology, Adelaide, South Australia and paid for by Cumberland Pharma, Nashville, TN.
Reprints not available from the authors.
PII: S0196-0644(04)01326-5
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.08.040
© 2005 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
