Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 302-310, March 2005

The Mortality of Untreated Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Department Patients

  • Kirsten K. Calder, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Kirsten K. Calder, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, LAC+USC Medical Center, 1200 N. State Street, Room 1011, Los Angeles, CA 90033; 213-226-6667, fax 213-226-8044
  • ,
  • Mel Herbert, MD
  • ,
  • Sean O. Henderson, MD

From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

Received 28 April 2004; received in revised form 3 September 2004; accepted 4 October 2004. published online 06 January 2005.

Much of the literature on pulmonary embolism that is commonly referenced by emergency physicians begins with statistics concerning how often the diagnosis is missed and the lethality of pulmonary embolism if undiagnosed and untreated. It is likely that many emergency physicians continue to pursue an aggressive diagnostic strategy even in low-risk patients because of concerns about the potential for poor patient outcome and the medicolegal consequences of a missed diagnosis. The believed and often-quoted mortality and recurrence rates for untreated or missed pulmonary embolism are 26% to 30%. However, these figures originate from investigations that have little relevance to modern emergency medicine, which include studies dating to the 1940s, many of which have significant methodologic pitfalls. These data are also based primarily on either inpatient or autopsy populations, neither of which is representative of patients treated in the emergency department (ED). Analysis of untreated or missed pulmonary embolism in ambulatory patients reveals mortality and recurrence rates of less than 5%. This article discusses the background of commonly quoted pulmonary embolism statistics and highlights the need for future investigations enrolling ED patients that focus on disease outcome in this population.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding and support: The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.

PII: S0196-0644(04)01494-5

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.10.001

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 302-310, March 2005