Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 46, Issue 4 , Pages 328-336, October 2005

Airway Management by US and Canadian Emergency Medicine Residents: A Multicenter Analysis of More Than 6,000 Endotracheal Intubation Attempts

  • Mark J. Sagarin, MD
  • ,
  • Erik D. Barton, MD
  • ,
  • Yi-Mei Chng, MD
  • ,
  • Ron M. Walls, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Ron M. Walls, MD, Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, NH-2, Boston, MA 02115
  • ,
  • on behalf of the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Investigators

From the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM (Sagarin); University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (Barton); Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency, Boston, MA (Walls); Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Chng, Walls); and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Chng, Walls)

Received 26 May 2004; received in revised form 8 November 2004 and 3 January 2005; accepted 7 January 2005. published online 06 June 2005.

Study objective

We determine success rates of endotracheal intubation performed in emergency departments (EDs) by North American emergency medicine residents.

Methods

During 58 months, physicians performing intubations at 31 university-affiliated EDs in 3 nations completed a data form that was entered into the National Emergency Airway Registry 2 database. Included were all patients undergoing endotracheal intubation in the ED. The data form included patients' age, sex, weight, indication for intubation, technique of airway management, names and dosages of all medications used to facilitate intubation, level of training and specialty of the intubator, number of attempts, success or failure, and adverse events. We queried this prospectively gathered, observational data to analyze intubations done by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents.

Results

Enrollment was incomplete (eg, 85% at the main study center), so the study sample did not include all consecutive patients. Emergency medicine residents performed 77% (5768/7498; 95% confidence interval [CI] 76% to 78%) of all initial intubation attempts in the United States and Canada. The first intubator was successful in 90% (5,193/5,757; 95% CI 89% to 91%) of cases, including 83% (4,775/5,757; 95% CI 82% to 84%) on the first attempt. Success rates on the first attempt were as follows: postgraduate year 1=72% (498/692; 95% CI 68% to 75%), postgraduate year 2=82% (2,081/2,544; 95% CI 80% to 83%), postgraduate year 3=88% (1,963/2,238; 95% CI 86% to 89%), postgraduate year 4+=82% (233/283; 95% CI 77% to 87%), and attending physician=89% (689/772; 95% CI 87% to 91%). Success rates by the first intubator were as follows: postgraduate year 1=80% (553/692; 95% CI 77% to 83%), postgraduate year 2=89% (2,272/2,544; 95% CI 88% to 90%), postgraduate year 3=94% (2,105/2,238; 95% CI 93% to 95%), postgraduate year 4+=93% (263/283; 95% CI 89% to 96%), and attending physician=98% (755/772; 95% CI 96% to 99%). Rapid sequence intubation technique was used in 78% (4,513/5,768; 95% CI 77% to 79%) of initial attempts: it resulted in 85% (3,843/4,513; 95% CI 84% to 86%) success on the first attempt and 91% (4,117/4,513; 95% CI 90% to 92%) success by the first intubator. The overall rate of cricothyrotomy for all emergency resident intubations was 0.9% (50/5,757; 95% CI 0.6% to 1.1%). When an initial intubator failed, 40% (385/954; 95% CI 37% to 44%) of rescue attempts were performed by emergency medicine residents. Among emergency medicine residents, success on the first rescue attempt was 80% (297/371; 95% CI 76% to 84%), and success by the first rescue intubator was 88% (328/371; 95% CI 85% to 91%).

Conclusion

Success of initial intubation attempts increased over the first 3 years of residency. This large multicenter study demonstrates the success of airway management by emergency medicine residents in North America. Using rapid-sequence intubation predominantly, emergency medicine residents achieved high levels of success.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Robert K. Knopp, MDAuthor contributions: RW conceived the overall NEAR study database, designed and established the database, and chairs the NEAR steering committee. MJS, EDB, and RMW designed this substudy from the database. Y-MC assisted in the database queries and statistical analysis. MJS performed statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed substantially to the manuscript revision. MJS takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.Funding and Support: The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.Presented as an abstract at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) New England regional conference, March 2003, and SAEM national conference, Worcester, MA, May 2003, and was published in Academic Emergency Medicine (2003;10:467-b-468-b).Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(05)00075-2

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.01.009

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 46, Issue 4 , Pages 328-336, October 2005