Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 45, Issue 6 , Pages 655-658, June 2005

Secondary Contamination of Emergency Department Personnel from o-Chlorobenzylidene Malononitrile Exposure, 2002

From the Division of Health Studies, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch (Horton, Rossiter, Kaye), and the Division of Toxicology, Emergency Response and Scientific Assessment Branch (Burgess), Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA

Received 18 October 2004; received in revised form 25 January 2005; accepted 26 January 2005. published online 18 April 2005.

In a hazardous materials event in 2002, the unannounced presentation of 3 symptomatic, contaminated patients to an emergency department (ED) resulted in secondary contamination of 2 ED personnel who experienced skin, eye, and respiratory irritation. The material that caused these injuries was o-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile, a white powder with a peppery odor used largely as a tear gas and riot-control agent.

Secondary contamination can cause adverse symptoms and injuries in ED personnel, further contaminate the ED, and potentially lead to costly ED closures and evacuations. To prevent secondary exposure, EDs can educate their staff about the potential for secondary contamination, implement a team approach for handling contaminated patients, establish decontamination protocols, ensure proper selection of and training in the use of personal protective equipment, and simulate drills for receiving contaminated patients.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding and support: The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.The views expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

PII: S0196-0644(05)00137-X

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.01.031

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 45, Issue 6 , Pages 655-658, June 2005