« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 46, Issue 6
, Pages 525-533
, December 2005
Emergency Physicians' Fear of Malpractice in Evaluating Patients With Possible Acute Cardiac Ischemia
References
- . National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1997 Emergency Department Summary: Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No. 304. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1999;
- Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1163–1170
- Malpractice claims against emergency physicians in Massachusetts: 1975-1993. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:341–345
- . The problem of defensive medicine. Science. 1978;200:879–882
- Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: do physicians' risk attitudes make the difference?. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:557–564
- . Defensive Medicine and Medical Malpractice. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1994;
- Measuring defensive medicine using clinical scenario surveys. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996;21:185–217
- . Billions for defense: the pervasive nature of defensive medicine. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2399–2402
- Physicians' perceptions of the risk of being sued. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992;17:462–482
- Impact of the AHCPR Unstable Angina Guideline on the triage of ED patients with possible acute cardiac ischemia. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(suppl 1):113
- . Acute coronary events in a general practice: objectives and design of the Imminent Myocardial Infarction Rotterdam Study. Heart Bull. 1976;7:91–98
- ACC key elements and data definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:2114–2130
- Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:845–855
- The use of empiric clinical data in the evaluation of practice guidelines for unstable angina. JAMA. 1996;276:1568–1574
- Unstable Angina: Diagnosis and Management: Clinical Practice Guideline Number 10. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1994;
- Validation of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) classification for managing unstable angina. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:959–965
- Sex differences in evaluation and outcome of unstable angina. JAMA. 2000;283:646–652
- Risk aversion and costs: a comparison of family physicians and general internists. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:12–17
- Why do physicians vary so widely in their referral rates?. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:163–168
- Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:956–963
- . Myocardial infarction redefined: a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:959–969
- . Diagnosis of Chest Pain. Bloomington, MN: ISCI; 2002;
- . Multilevel Statistical Models. London: Edward Arnold; 1995;
- Measuring physician attitudes toward cost, uncertainty, malpractice, and utilitization review. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:544–549
- . Physician and medical student bias in evaluating diagnostic information. Med Decis Making. 1981;1:145–164
- . How did the acute ischemic heart disease predictive instrument reduce unnecessary coronary care unit admissions?. Med Decis Making. 1988;8:90–94
- Evidence-based Practice Program. Prediction of Risk for Patients with Unstable Angina. Vol. 2004. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; 2000;
- ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-2002: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina). Circulation. 2002;106:1893–1900
- Do malpractice concerns, payment mechanisms, and attitudes influence test-ordering decisions?. Neurology. 2004;62:119–121
- . Is the defensive use of diagnostic tests good for patients, or bad?. Med Decis Making. 1998;18:19–28
- Electrocardiograph-based emergency department risk management tool based on the ACI-TIPI: potential impact on care and malpractice claims. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2002;11–17
- Improving the care of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department: the CRUSADE initiative. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:1146–1155
- Early use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the ED treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a local quality improvement initiative. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21:302–308
- . Medical Malpractice. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:283–292
- . Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1992;
Supervising editor: J. Stephan Stapczynski, MDAuthor contributions: DAK was responsible for study concept and design and drafting of the manuscript. DAK, TPA, and MB were responsible for acquisition of the data. DAK, GCW, and RLB conducted analysis and interpretation of the data. DAK, GCW, RLB, TPA, MB, PSR, and HPS were involved in critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. RB contributed statistical expertise. DAK and HPS obtained funding. DAK and TPA were responsible for study supervision. DAK takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.Funding and support: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS10466), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Generalist Physician Faculty Scholars Program (Dr. Katz), with supplemental support from the University of Wisconsin Department of Medicine.Presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine annual meeting, May 2004, Washington, DC.
The views in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
PII: S0196-0644(05)00468-3
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.04.016
© 2005 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 46, Issue 6
, Pages 525-533
, December 2005
