Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 47, Issue 6 , Pages 525-530, June 2006

Etomidate Versus Midazolam for Out-of-Hospital Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

Presented as a poster at the American College of Emergency Physicians Research Forum, October 2003, Boston, MA.

  • Jeanne Jacoby, MD

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Medicine Residency, St. Luke’s Hospital, Bethlehem, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Jeanne Jacoby, MD, Emergency Medicine Residency, St. Luke’s Hospital, 801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015; 610-954-4903, fax 610-954-2153
  • ,
  • Michael Heller, MD

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Medicine Residency, St. Luke’s Hospital, Bethlehem, PA
  • ,
  • Jonathan Nicholas, NREMT-P

      Affiliations

    • Bethlehem Township EMS, Bethlehem, PA
  • ,
  • Nilesh Patel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Medicine Residency, St. Luke’s Hospital, Bethlehem, PA
  • ,
  • Mark Cesta, MD

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Medicine Residency, St. Luke’s Hospital, Bethlehem, PA
  • ,
  • Gordon Smith, EMT-P

      Affiliations

    • Bethlehem City EMS, Bethlehem, PA.
  • ,
  • Sharon Jacob, MD

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Medicine Residency, St. Luke’s Hospital, Bethlehem, PA
  • ,
  • James Reed, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Medicine Residency, St. Luke’s Hospital, Bethlehem, PA

Received 1 September 2005; received in revised form 18 November 2005 and 2 December 2005; accepted 9 December 2005. published online 08 February 2006.

Study objective

The primary objective of this study is to compare the intubation success rates of etomidate and midazolam when used for sedative-facilitated intubation, without paralytics, in out-of-hospital adult patients.

Methods

This prospective, double-blind, randomized trial was conducted with 2 ground out-of-hospital advanced life support systems (ALS); all patients aged 18 or older who required out-of-hospital sedative-facilitated intubation were eligible for participation. The ambulances were stocked with blinded numbered syringes containing either 7 mg of midazolam or 20 mg of etomidate. No paralytics were used. If sedation was not achieved with the study drug, medics could request additional sedation from a medical command physician; only midazolam or diazepam were available outside of the study.

Results

One hundred ten patients were enrolled in the study; 55 patients received midazolam and 55 patients received etomidate. The 2 groups were similar with regard to age, sex, initial vital signs, and reasons for intubation or sedation. The overall intubation success rate was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 84%); 75% (41/55) for midazolam (95% CI 64% to 86%) and 76% (42/55) for etomidate (95% CI 65% to 87%). There was also no difference in incidence of hypotension, number of intubation attempts, or perceived difficulty of intubation. Additional sedation was requested almost equally for the 2 groups: 14 patients in the midazolam group and 12 patients in the etomidate group. A benzodiazepine was successful for rescue of a failed etomidate intubation 10 of 12 times (83%; 95% CI 62% to 100%). When used for rescue of failed midazolam intubations, benzodiazepines were effective in only 5 of 14 (36%, 95% CI 11% to 61%) attempts.

Conclusion

There were no observed differences between midazolam and etomidate in sedation-facilitated intubation success rates; we could not fully evaluate global outcomes of these agents or the sedative-facilitated intubation strategy itself.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Donald M. Yealy, MD

 Author contributions: JJ, MH, JN conceived the study and designed the trial. JJ, GS, JM supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection. JR provided statistical advice on study design and analyzed the data and performed interim analysis. MC, JJ, GS, JN were responsible for paramedic teaching and field implementation. NP performed data collection and formatting (pre-hospital). SJ performed data collection and formatting (follow-up). JJ and MH drafted the manuscript. JJ takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(05)02042-1

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.009

Refers to article:

  • Out-of-Hospital Endotracheal Intubation: Half Empty or Half Full? , 27 February 2006

    John H. Burton
    Annals of Emergency Medicine June 2006 (Vol. 47, Issue 6, Pages 542-544)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 47, Issue 6 , Pages 525-530, June 2006