« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 48, Issue 3
, Pages 304-308
, September 2006
Current Status of Peer Review at Annals of Emergency Medicine
References
-
American College of Emergency Physicians. An instructional guide for peer reviewers of biomedical manuscripts. Available at: http://www3.us.elsevierhealth.com/extractor/graphics/em-acep. Accessed May 6, 2006.
- Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? a randomized controlled trial . JAMA . 1998;280:240–243
- Masking author identity in peer review (what factors influence masking success?) . JAMA . 1998;280:243–246
- The effect of dedicated methodology and statistical review on published manuscript quality . Ann Emerg Med . 2002;40:334–337
- The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review (a content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers) . Ann Emerg Med . 2002;40:329–333
- Who reviews the reviewers? feasibility of using a fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance . Ann Emerg Med . 1998;32:310–317
- Reliability of editors’ subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts . JAMA . 1998;280:229–231
- . Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews (two randomized trials) . JAMA . 2002;287:2781–2783
- . Journal performance report for 2005 . Ann Emerg Med . 2006;48:302–303
Funding and support: The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.
PII: S0196-0644(06)01015-8
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.07.009
© 2006 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 48, Issue 3
, Pages 304-308
, September 2006
