Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 49, Issue 1 , Pages 23-30, January 2007

A Prospective Evaluation of “Ketofol” (Ketamine/Propofol Combination) for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department

  • Elaine Victoria Willman, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • ,
  • Gary Andolfatto, MD

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Department, Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Gary Andolfatto, MD, Emergency Department, Lions Gate Hospital, 231 East 15th Street, North Vancouver, British Columbia V7L 2L7, Canada; 604-839-3766, fax 604-984-3526

Received 28 April 2006; received in revised form 10 July 2006 and 27 July 2006; accepted 7 August 2006. published online 27 October 2006.

Study objective

We evaluate the effectiveness and consider the safety of intravenous ketamine/propofol combination (“ketofol”) in the same syringe for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

A prospective case series of consecutive ketofol procedural sedation and analgesia events in the ED of a trauma-receiving community teaching hospital from July 2005 to February 2006 was studied. Patients of all ages, with any comorbid conditions, were included. Ketofol (1:1 mixture of ketamine 10 mg/mL and propofol 10 mg/mL) was administered intravenously at the discretion of the treating physician by using titrated aliquots. The presence or absence of adverse events was documented, as were procedural success, recovery time, and physician, nurse, and patient satisfaction. Physiologic data were recorded with established hospital procedural sedation and analgesia guidelines.

Results

One hundred fourteen procedural sedation and analgesia events using ketofol were performed for primarily orthopedic procedures. The median dose of medication administered was ketamine at 0.75 mg/kg and propofol at 0.75 mg/kg (range 0.2 to 2.05 mg/kg each of propofol and ketamine; interquartile range [IQR] 0.6 to 1.0 mg/kg). Procedures were successfully performed without adjunctive sedatives in 110 (96.5%) patients. Three patients (2.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6% to 7.5%) had transient hypoxia; of these, 1 (0.9%; 95% CI 0.02% to 4.8%) required bag-valve-mask ventilation. Four patients (3.5%; 95% CI 1.0% to 8.7%) required repositioning for airway malalignment, 4 patients (3.5%; 95% CI 1.0% to 8.7%) required adjunctive medication for sedation, and 3 patients (2.6%; 95% CI 0.6% to 7.5%) had mild unpleasant emergence, of whom 1 (0.9%; 95% CI 0.02% to 4.8%) received midazolam. No patient had hypotension or vomiting or received endotracheal intubation. Median recovery time was 15 minutes (range 5 to 45 minutes; IQR 12 to 19 minutes). Median physician, nurse, and patient satisfaction scores were 10 on a 1-to-10 scale.

Conclusion

Ketofol procedural sedation and analgesia is effective and appears to be safe for painful procedures in the ED. Few adverse events occurred and were either self-limited or responded to minimal interventions. Recoveries were rapid, and staff and patients were highly satisfied.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Author contributions: EVW and GA conceived the study. EVW performed background literature review, designed the study, tabulated data, and provided statistical analyses. GA supervised conduct of trial and data collection. EVW and GA drafted article. GA takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.Funding and support: The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.Supervising editor: Steven M. Green, MDReprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(06)02004-X

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.002

Refers to article:

  • Research Advances in Procedural Sedation and Analgesia , 06 November 2006

    Steven M. Green
    Annals of Emergency Medicine January 2007 (Vol. 49, Issue 1, Pages 31-36)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 49, Issue 1 , Pages 23-30, January 2007