Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 49, Issue 3 , Pages 355-363 , March 2007

Knowledge Translation: Closing the Evidence-to-Practice Gap

  • Eddy S. Lang, MDCM, CCFP(EM), CSPQ

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, McGill University and Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Lang)
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Eddy S. Lang, MDCM, CCFP(EM), CSPQ, Emergency Department, SMBD Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2; 514-340-8222 ext 5568, fax 514-340-8138
  • ,
  • Peter C. Wyer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (Wyer)
  • ,
  • R. Brian Haynes, MD, PhD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Haynes)

Received 11 July 2006 ,Revised 14 August 2006 ,Accepted 25 August 2006.

  • Image Result

    A model for closing the evidence-to-practice gap. This schematic demonstrates 4 stages of moving from research to practice-altering outcomes. The first stage involves getting the evidence straight, il

    A model for closing the evidence-to-practice gap. This schematic demonstrates 4 stages of moving from research to practice-altering outcomes. The first stage involves getting the evidence straight, illustrated by increasingly more applicable forms of information drawn from valid and important clinical research and represented in the 4S pyramid. The evidence-to-practice pipeline, also shown, reveals the dissipation of useful conclusions from clinical research, thus failing to make it into practice. The 3 remaining disciplines of knowledge translation can facilitate evidence uptake and help close the gap between research and practice. Adapted from Glasziou and Haynes.16 EBM, Evidence-based medicine; CQI, continuous quality improvement.

  • Image Result
    Barriers to evidence uptake. Innovation and change in clinical practice at the individual, departmental, and institutional levels are contingent on 3 key sources of behavior change: knowledge, attitud

    Barriers to evidence uptake. Innovation and change in clinical practice at the individual, departmental, and institutional levels are contingent on 3 key sources of behavior change: knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. However, a series of complex barriers exists for each of these dimensions, some of which are illustrated here. Adapted from Cabana et al.33

 Supervising editor: E. John Gallagher, MD

 Funding and support: The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(06)02142-1

doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.022

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 49, Issue 3 , Pages 355-363 , March 2007