Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 49, Issue 3 , Pages 325-332.e1, March 2007

Evaluation of a Modified Prediction Instrument to Identify Significant Pediatric Intracranial Injury After Blunt Head Trauma

  • Benjamin C. Sun, MD, MPP

      Affiliations

    • Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program (Sun)
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Benjamin C. Sun, MD, MPP, Mail Stop 111, Building 500, Wing 3E, West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073; 310-268-3002, fax 310-268-4818
  • ,
  • Jerome R. Hoffman, MA, MD

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Medicine Center (Hoffman, Mower), University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • William R. Mower, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Medicine Center (Hoffman, Mower), University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Received 9 June 2006; received in revised form 21 July 2006 and 9 August 2006; accepted 30 August 2006. published online 08 January 2007.

Study objective

We evaluate the effect of a modification of the University of California–Davis Pediatric Head Injury Rule on the ability of the decision instrument for pediatric head injury to predict clinically important intracranial injury in an external cohort.

Methods

We analyzed data prospectively recorded in 1,666 pediatric patients enrolled in the derivation set of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study II (NEXUS II). Treating physicians at 21 emergency departments recorded the presence or absence of clinical predictors on all patients who received a head computed tomography (CT) scan after experiencing blunt head trauma. Predictors included 3 exact elements of the University of California–Davis Rule (abnormal mental status, signs of skull fracture, and scalp hematoma in children ≤2 years of age), some with different wording, and 2 modified elements with new definitions (the presence of high-risk vomiting or severe headache, rather than any vomiting or headache).

Results

A significant intracranial injury was identified by CT in 138 (8.3%) patients. Sensitivity of the modified instrument to detect significant intracranial injury was 90.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85.4% to 95.4%); 13 children with such an injury were misclassified as low risk. Specificity of the modified instrument was 42.7% (95% CI 40.1% to 45.3%).

Conclusion

In the NEXUS II cohort, a modified version of the University of California–Davis Rule misclassified a substantial proportion of pediatric patients with clinically important blunt head injury. Although we cannot evaluate the exact University of California–Davis Rule, we demonstrate that using stricter definitions of “headache” and “vomiting” and different wording than in the original study may have unintended or negative consequences. We emphasize the importance of careful attention to precise definitions of clinical predictors when a decision instrument is used.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Kathy N. Shaw, MD, MSCE

 Author contributions: BCS, JRH, and WRM conceived the study. JRH and WRM obtained funding for this study and were responsible for data collection. BCS performed the data analysis and drafted the article. All authors contributed substantially to article revisions. BCS takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: This study was supported in part by the UCLA Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program (Sun) and grant RO1 HS09699 (Mower).

 Reprints not available from authors.

PII: S0196-0644(06)02152-4

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.032

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 49, Issue 3 , Pages 325-332.e1, March 2007