Measuring and Forecasting Emergency Department Crowding in Real Time
Study objective
We quantified the potential for monitoring current and near-future emergency department (ED) crowding by using 4 measures: the Emergency Department Work Index (EDWIN), the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS), the Demand Value of the Real-time Emergency Analysis of Demand Indicators (READI), and the Work Score.
Methods
We calculated the 4 measures at 10-minute intervals during an 8-week study period (June 21, 2006, to August 16, 2006). Ambulance diversion status was the outcome variable for crowding, and occupancy level was the performance baseline measure. We evaluated discriminatory power for current crowding by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). To assess forecasting power, we applied activity monitoring operating characteristic curves, which measure the timeliness of early warnings at various false alarm rates.
Results
We recorded 7,948 observations during the study period. The ED was on ambulance diversion during 30% of the observations. The AUC was 0.81 for the EDWIN, 0.88 for the NEDOCS, 0.65 for the READI Demand Value, 0.90 for the Work Score, and 0.90 for occupancy level. In the activity monitoring operating characteristic analysis, only the occupancy level provided more than an hour of advance warning (median 1 hour 7 minutes) before crowding, with 1 false alarm per week.
Conclusion
The EDWIN, the NEDOCS, and the Work Score monitor current ED crowding with high discriminatory power, although none of them exceeded the performance of occupancy level across the range of operating points. None of the measures provided substantial advance warning before crowding at low rates of false alarms.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supervising editors: Michael J. Schull, MD, MSc; Michael L. Callaham, MDAuthor contributions: NRH and DA conceived the study. All authors contributed substantially to the study design. DA and IJ obtained research funding. NRH implemented the software and collected the data. NRH and CZ performed the statistical analysis. NRH drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. NRH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.Funding and support: Mr. Hoot was supported by the National Library of Medicine grant LM07450-02 and National Institute of General Medical Studies grant T32 GM07347. The research was also supported by the National Library of Medicine grant R21 LM009002-01.Publication dates: Available online March 27, 2007.Reprints not available from the authors.
PII: S0196-0644(07)00077-7
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.01.017
© 2007 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to erratum:
- Correction
