Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 50, Issue 4 , Pages 387-395, October 2007

What Whiteboards in a Trauma Center Operating Suite Can Teach Us About Emergency Department Communication

  • Yan Xiao, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Yan Xiao, PhD, Division of Research in Patient Safety, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201, 410-328-7179, fax 410-328-7230
  • ,
  • Stephen Schenkel, MD, MPP

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Samer Faraj, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland R.H. Smith School of Business, College Park, MD
  • ,
  • Colin F. Mackenzie, MB ChB, FRCA

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Jacqueline Moss, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.

Received 1 July 2006; received in revised form 29 December 2006; accepted 26 March 2007. published online 11 May 2007.

Study objective

Highly reliable, efficient collaborative work relies on excellent communication. We seek to understand how a traditional whiteboard is used as a versatile information artifact to support communication in rapid-paced, highly dynamic collaborative work. The similar communicative demands of the trauma operating suite and an emergency department (ED) make the findings applicable to both settings.

Methods

We took photographs and observed staff’s interaction with a whiteboard in a 6-bed surgical suite dedicated to trauma service. We analyzed the integral role of artifacts in cognitive activities as when workers configure and manage visual spaces to simplify their cognitive tasks. We further identified characteristics of the whiteboard as a communicative information artifact in supporting coordination in fast-paced environments.

Results

We identified 8 ways in which the whiteboard was used by physicians, nurses, and with other personnel to support collaborative work: task management, team attention management, task status tracking, task articulation, resource planning and tracking, synchronous and asynchronous communication, multidisciplinary problem solving and negotiation, and socialization and team building. The whiteboard was highly communicative because of its location and installation method, high interactivity and usability, high expressiveness, and ability to visualize transition points to support work handoffs.

Conclusion

Traditional information artifacts such as whiteboards play significant roles in supporting collaborative work. How these artifacts are used provides insights into complicated information needs of teamwork in highly dynamic, high-risk settings such as an ED.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Robert L. Wears, MD, MS

 Author contributions: YX conceived the study, design the study, and supervised data collection. YX, SF, and CFM obtained the funding. YX, SS, and CFM drafted the article. YX, SF, and JM developed concept framework. YX takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that may create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. This research was supported by National Science Foundation (ITR-0081868 and ITR-0325087). The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the authors’ employers nor the funding agency.

 Available online May 11, 2007.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(07)00388-5

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.027

Refers to article:

  • Studying the Technical Work of Emergency Care

    Christopher P. Nemeth, Richard I. Cook, Robert L. Wears
    Annals of Emergency Medicine October 2007 (Vol. 50, Issue 4, Pages 384-386)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 50, Issue 4 , Pages 387-395, October 2007