« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 3
, Pages 247-250
, March 2008
Treatment of Massive Fluid Overload as a Result of Constrictive Pericarditis With Ultrafiltration in the Emergency Department
References
- . Constrictive pericarditis versus restrictive cardiomyopathy: challenges in diagnosis and management. Cardiol Rev. 2004;12:314–320
- Peripherally inserted veno-venous ultrafiltration for rapid treatment of volume overloaded patients. J Card Fail. 2003;9:227–231
- Isolated ultrafiltration in moderate congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:424–431
- Ultrafiltration: a rational treatment for heart failure. Cardiology. 1989;76:384–390
- Large volume ultrafiltration for acute decompensated heart failure using standard peripheral intravenous catheters. J Card Fail. 2006;12:349–352
- . Diuretic therapy and resistance in congestive heart failure. Cardiology. 2001;96:132–143
- Ultrafiltration versus usual care for hospitalized patients with heart failure: the Relief for Acutely Fluid-Overloaded Patients with Decompensated Congestive Heart Failure (RAPID-CHF) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2043–2046
- Early ultrafiltration in patients with decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2047–2051
- Ultrafiltration versus intravenous diuretics for patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:675–683
- . Differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2005;6:61–71
- . The differentiation between restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis: the impact of the imaging techniques. Echocardiography. 1993;10:497–508
Supervising editor: W. Brian Gibler, MD
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that may create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Dr. Levy has received nonmonetary equipment support from Cardiodynamics, Inc. Dr. Guglin has received both monetary and equipment support from CHF Solutions, Inc. Cardiodynamics, Inc. and CHF Solutions, Inc. provided equipment for the clinical work described in this case report, but neither company provided any direct financial support. Additionally, this article was prepared and submitted independent of any input or review by representatives from either Cardiodynamics, Inc. or CHF Solutions, Inc.
Reprints not available from the authors.
Publication dates: Available online May 23, 2007.
PII: S0196-0644(07)00489-1
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.04.012
© 2008 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 3
, Pages 247-250
, March 2008
