Video as a Tool for Improving Tracheal Intubation Tasks for Emergency Medical and Trauma Care
Study objective
We illustrate how audio-video data records can improve emergency medical care, using airway management to show how such video data may help to identify unsafe acts, accident precursors, and latent and systems failures and to evaluate performance.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of videos of real patient resuscitation in a trauma center. Participant care providers reviewing their own videos of tracheal intubation identified failures to use diagnostic equipment, fixation errors, and team and communication errors.
Results
Neutral expert observers noted team coordination failures and poor error recovery. Comparison with a consensus guideline for a tracheal intubation task/communication pathway showed that communications were unclear or not made, and key tasks were omitted by team members. Differences were detected between performance of tracheal intubation in elective and emergency circumstances. Revised practices (“3 Cs”: clinical examination, communication, carbon dioxide) mitigated task performance and communication deficiencies.
Conclusion
Video is complementary to traditional quality improvement methods for improving performance in airway management and emergency medical and trauma care, assessing standard operating procedures, and reviewing communications. Video data identify performance details not found in quality improvement approaches, including medical record review or recall by participant care providers. Weaknesses in using video for data include lengthy video review processes, poor audio, and the inability to adequately analyze events outside the field of view. Opportunities are to use video audit for quality improvement of other emergency tasks. Video buffering reduces personnel requirements for capture and simplifies data extraction. Medicolegal and confidentiality threats are significant.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supervising editor: Robert L. Wears, MD, MSAuthor contributions: CFM conceived the study and obtained funding. CFM, YX, FMH, and JS were involved in data collection and analyses. CFM drafted the manuscript. MF, YX, and JS contributed substantially to the manuscript and revisions. CFM takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Funded by Office of Naval Research grant N00014-91-J-1540, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant P20-HS11-562, and National Science Foundation grant ITR-0081860. Opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the sponsors.Reprints not available from the authors.
PII: S0196-0644(07)01257-7
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.06.487
© 2007 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Studying the Technical Work of Emergency Care
