Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 50, Issue 4 , Pages 436-442.e1, October 2007

Video as a Tool for Improving Tracheal Intubation Tasks for Emergency Medical and Trauma Care

  • Colin F. Mackenzie, MBChB, FRCA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
    • The National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Colin F. Mackenzie, MBChB, FRCA, The National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, 701 W Pratt Street, Room 508, Baltimore, MD 21201; 410-378-8673, fax 410-328-2841
  • ,
  • Yan Xiao, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Fu-Ming Hu, MS, CNE

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • F. Jacob Seagull, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Mark Fitzgerald, MBBS, FACEM

      Affiliations

    • Australasian Trauma Society, Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital; and the National Trauma Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Received 13 June 2006; received in revised form 19 December 2006 and 3 May 2007; accepted 24 May 2007.

Study objective

We illustrate how audio-video data records can improve emergency medical care, using airway management to show how such video data may help to identify unsafe acts, accident precursors, and latent and systems failures and to evaluate performance.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of videos of real patient resuscitation in a trauma center. Participant care providers reviewing their own videos of tracheal intubation identified failures to use diagnostic equipment, fixation errors, and team and communication errors.

Results

Neutral expert observers noted team coordination failures and poor error recovery. Comparison with a consensus guideline for a tracheal intubation task/communication pathway showed that communications were unclear or not made, and key tasks were omitted by team members. Differences were detected between performance of tracheal intubation in elective and emergency circumstances. Revised practices (“3 Cs”: clinical examination, communication, carbon dioxide) mitigated task performance and communication deficiencies.

Conclusion

Video is complementary to traditional quality improvement methods for improving performance in airway management and emergency medical and trauma care, assessing standard operating procedures, and reviewing communications. Video data identify performance details not found in quality improvement approaches, including medical record review or recall by participant care providers. Weaknesses in using video for data include lengthy video review processes, poor audio, and the inability to adequately analyze events outside the field of view. Opportunities are to use video audit for quality improvement of other emergency tasks. Video buffering reduces personnel requirements for capture and simplifies data extraction. Medicolegal and confidentiality threats are significant.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Robert L. Wears, MD, MSAuthor contributions: CFM conceived the study and obtained funding. CFM, YX, FMH, and JS were involved in data collection and analyses. CFM drafted the manuscript. MF, YX, and JS contributed substantially to the manuscript and revisions. CFM takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Funded by Office of Naval Research grant N00014-91-J-1540, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant P20-HS11-562, and National Science Foundation grant ITR-0081860. Opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the sponsors.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(07)01257-7

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.06.487

Refers to article:

  • Studying the Technical Work of Emergency Care

    Christopher P. Nemeth, Richard I. Cook, Robert L. Wears
    Annals of Emergency Medicine October 2007 (Vol. 50, Issue 4, Pages 384-386)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 50, Issue 4 , Pages 436-442.e1, October 2007