Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 361-366, April 2008

What Are You Waiting For? A Study of Resident Physician-Parent Communication in a Pediatric Emergency Department

  • Kelly J. Cramm, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Center and Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, Orlando, FL.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Kelly Cramm, MD, MPH, 9125 Tuscan Valley Place, Orlando, FL 32825; 321-231-6614
  • ,
  • Mary D. Dowd, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO

Received 4 March 2007; received in revised form 21 July 2007; accepted 28 September 2007. published online 15 November 2007.

Study objective

This study measures the degree to which parents of patients, in the course of evaluation and treatment in a pediatric emergency department (ED), could report what they were waiting for.

Methods

Brief in-person interviews were conducted with parents of nonemergency patients during an ED visit. After the patient had been seen by a resident physician and evaluation and treatment were in progress, parents were asked to report what they were waiting for. The patient’s physician was also asked to report what the patient was waiting for. These answers were compared and coded as complete agreement, partial agreement, or disagreement. Association between lack of agreement and patient factors (age, sex), parent factors (sex, education, age), physician factors (sex, postgraduate year), and system factors (wait time, time of day, number of patients in the department) was examined. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios.

Results

A total of 200 paired surveys were included in the data analysis. Two thirds of parental reports completely agreed with physician reports, 11.5% partially agreed, and 21.5% completely disagreed. Multivariate analysis revealed that disagreement between resident physician and parents was associated with parental educational level and physician training level. Parents with less than a high school education were more than 9 times more likely to disagree than those with at least some college education (odds ratio 9.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4 to 35.7). As the postgraduate level of the physician decreased, disagreement was more common; disagreement for patients of postgraduate level 1 residents was 5 times more likely (95% CI 1.8 to 14.5) than that of postgraduate level 3 and higher residents.

Conclusion

As measured by asking the question “what are you waiting for,” significant communication gaps were identified between physicians and the parents of their patients in this emergency department. One in five parents could not report what they were waiting for. Factors such as lower parental education and less physician experience increase the risk of such a gap. Further work in defining the source of the ineffective communication and interventions to remediate the problem is needed.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Kathy N. Shaw, MD, MSCE

 Author contributions: KJC and MDD conceived the study, designed the study, and analyzed the results. KJC performed the interviews and managed the data. KJC wrote the article. KJC and MDD contributed significantly to its revision. KJC takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.

 Publication dates: Available online November 19, 2007.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(07)01627-7

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.09.032

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 361-366, April 2008