Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 407-411, April 2008

Acute Hypersensitivity Reactions Associated With Administration of Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab Antivenom

  • Robert Cannon, DO

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Toxicology, Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Robert Cannon, DO, Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, UPMC-Presbyterian, 200 Lothrop Street, Suite DL-45, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; 412-647-9922, fax 412-647-5053
  • ,
  • Anne-Michelle Ruha, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Toxicology, Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ
  • ,
  • John Kashani, DO

      Affiliations

    • New Jersey Poison and Information Education System, Newark, NJ, and Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ.

Received 13 March 2007; received in revised form 11 June 2007 and 16 August 2007; accepted 28 September 2007. published online 21 January 2008.

Study objective

Acute hypersensitivity reactions are well known to occur with the administration of the Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent (Wyeth Laboratories, Marietta, PA). Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (ovine) (CroFab; FabAV, Protherics, Inc., Brentwood, TN) was introduced in 2001, and early studies reported a hypersensitivity reaction rate up to 19%. We describe the incidence of acute hypersensitivity reactions to FabAV in patients bitten by rattlesnakes.

Methods

This was a nonconcurrent observational cohort study, with data obtained by chart review of all patients admitted to our service for rattlesnake bites from July 2000 to June 2004. The study was conducted at an urban Level I trauma center and urban children’s hospital. All patients treated with FabAV were included. Those who received no antivenom or who were treated with Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent were excluded. The main outcome variable was whether an acute hypersensitivity reaction developed.

Results

Ninety-three patients were included in the review (72 male and 21 female patients). The mean age was 34.5 years (range 16 months to 91 years), and the mean dose of antivenom was 12 vials (range 4 to 32 vials). The incidence of acute hypersensitivity reactions was 5 of 93, or 5.4%. Four patients developed a mild reaction that was easily treated and were able to finish the full course of antivenom. Only 1 patient developed a reaction that prevented further antivenom administration.

Conclusion

FabAV appears to be associated with a lower incidence of acute hypersensitivity than initially reported. Most reactions are mild and easily treated and do not preclude further dosing of antivenom.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Richard C. Dart, MD, PhD

 Author contributions: RC performed chart review and wrote the article. A-MR conceived the idea for the study, developed the protocol and data sheet, performed second review of 20% of charts, and participated in writing the article. JK developed the protocol and data sheet and performed chart review. RC takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.

 Publication dates: Available online January 11, 2008.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(07)01675-7

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.09.036

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 407-411, April 2008