Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 433-442.e7, April 2008

Does Screening in the Emergency Department Hurt or Help Victims of Intimate Partner Violence?

Presented at a panel presentation at the Family Violence Prevention Fund conference, March 2007, San Francisco, CA.

  • Debra Houry, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Debra Houry, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, 49 Jesse Hill Jr Dr SE #114, Atlanta, GA 30303; 404-616-3181, fax 404-616-6182
  • ,
  • Nadine J. Kaslow, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Robin S. Kemball, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Louise Anne McNutt, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY
  • ,
  • Catherine Cerulli, PhD, JD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
  • ,
  • Helen Straus, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Eli Rosenberg, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Chengxing Lu, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Karin V. Rhodes, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Received 11 May 2007; received in revised form 16 September 2007 and 31 October 2007; accepted 6 November 2007. published online 04 March 2008.

Study objective

Recent systematic reviews have noted a lack of evidence that screening for intimate partner violence does more good than harm. We assess whether patients screened for intimate partner violence on a computer kiosk in the emergency department (ED) experienced any adverse events during or subsequent to the ED visit and whether computer kiosk identification and referral of intimate partner violence in the ED setting resulted in safety behaviors or contact with referrals.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, observational study in which a convenience sample of male and female ED patients triaged to the waiting room who screened positive (on a computer kiosk-based questionnaire) for intimate partner violence in the past year were provided with resources and information and invited to participate in a series of follow-up interviews. At 1-week and 3-month follow-up visits, we assessed intimate partner violence, safety issues, and use of resources. In addition, to obtain an objective measure of safety, we assessed the number of violence-related 911 calls to participant addresses within a call district 6 months before and 6 months after the index ED visit.

Results

Of the 2,134 participants in a relationship in the last year, 548 (25.7%) screened positive for intimate partner violence. No safety issues, such as calling security or a partner’s interference with the screening, occurred during the ED visit for any patient who disclosed intimate partner violence. Of the 216 intimate partner violence victims interviewed in person and 65 contacted by telephone 1 week later, no intimate partner violence victims reported any injuries or increased intimate partner violence resulting from participating in the study. For the sample in the local police district, there was no increase in the number of intimate partner violence victims who called 911 in the 6 months after the ED visit. Finally, 35% (n=131) reported they had contacted community resources during the 3-month follow-up period.

Conclusion

Among patients screening positive for intimate partner violence, there were no identified adverse events related to screening, and many had contacted community resources.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editors: Rita K. Cydulka, MD, MS; Michael L. Callaham, MD

 Author contributions: DH, NJK, LAM, CC, HS, and KVR developed the study design and obtained funding. DH, NJK, and RSK oversaw the study protocol and enrollment of participants. ER and CL performed statistical analyses. All authors participated in drafting and revising the article and all approved the final version. DH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Supported by CDC R-49 grant 4230113 (Houry), NIMH K-23 grant 069375 (Houry), and NIMH K23 64574 (Rhodes).

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(07)01786-6

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.11.019

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 433-442.e7, April 2008