The Utility of Supplemental Oxygen During Emergency Department Procedural Sedation With Propofol: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Study objective
We determine whether supplemental oxygen reduces the incidence of hypoxia by 20% compared with breathing room air in adult study patients receiving propofol for emergency department procedural sedation.
Methods
Patients were randomized to receive either supplemental oxygen or compressed air by nasal cannula at 3 L per minute. Physicians were blinded to the gas used and end tidal CO2 (etco2) data. Respiratory depression was defined a priori as oxygen saturation less than or equal to 93%, an etco2 level of greater than or equal to 50 mm Hg, an absolute etco2 change from baseline of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg, or loss of the etco2 waveform.
Results
Of the 110 patients analyzed, 56 received supplemental oxygen and 54 received room air. Ten (18%) patients in the supplemental oxygen group and 15 (28%) patients in the compressed air group experienced hypoxia (P=.3, effect size=10%, 95% confidence interval −24% to 7%). Twenty-seven patients (20 supplemental oxygen; 7 room air) met etco2 criteria for respiratory depression but did not become hypoxic. Physicians identified respiratory depression in 23 of 25 patients who developed hypoxia compared with only 1 of 27 patients who met etco2 criteria for respiratory depression but who did not have hypoxia. One patient in the supplemental oxygen group experienced a transient arrhythmia and had a short apneic episode, both of which resolved spontaneously. The patient was admitted for observation.
Conclusion
Supplemental oxygen (3 L/minute) trended toward reducing hypoxia in adult study patients; however, the 10% difference observed was not statistically significant and was below our a priori 20% threshold. Blinded capnography frequently identified respiratory depression undetected by the treating physicians.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supervising editor: Steven M. Green, MD
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that may create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.
Author contributions: KD and CRC conceived the study and designed the trial. KD, CRC, and PD supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection. KD, CRC, and PD managed the data, including quality control. PD provided statistical advice on study design and analyzed the data. KD drafted the article. CRC provided editorial support and contributed substantially to its revisions. KD takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Earn CME Credit: Continuing Medical Education for this article is available at: www.ACEP-EMedHome.com.
Reprints not available from the authors.
Publication dates: Available online March 4, 2008.
PII: S0196-0644(07)01859-8
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.11.040
© 2008 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
-
Supplemental Oxygen During Propofol Sedation: Yes or No?
, 18 February 2008
