Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 116-125, August 2008

Forecasting Emergency Department Crowding: A Discrete Event Simulation

  • Nathan R. Hoot, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Nathan R. Hoot, PhD, 400 Eskind Biomedical Library, 2209 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232; 615-936-3720, fax 615-936-1427
  • ,
  • Larry J. LeBlanc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
  • ,
  • Ian Jones, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
  • ,
  • Scott R. Levin, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
  • ,
  • Chuan Zhou, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • ,
  • Cynthia S. Gadd, PhD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
  • ,
  • Dominik Aronsky, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

Received 21 June 2007; received in revised form 21 September 2007; accepted 3 December 2007. published online 04 April 2008.

Study objective

To develop a discrete event simulation of emergency department (ED) patient flow for the purpose of forecasting near-future operating conditions and to validate the forecasts with several measures of ED crowding.

Methods

We developed a discrete event simulation of patient flow with evidence from the literature. Development was purely theoretical, whereas validation involved patient data from an academic ED. The model inputs and outputs, respectively, are 6-variable descriptions of every present and future patient in the ED. We validated the model by using a sliding-window design, ensuring separation of fitting and validation data in time series. We sampled consecutive 10-minute observations during 2006 (n=52,560). The outcome measures—all forecast 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours into the future from each observation—were the waiting count, waiting time, occupancy level, length of stay, boarding count, boarding time, and ambulance diversion. Forecasting performance was assessed with Pearson's correlation, residual summary statistics, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

The correlations between crowding forecasts and actual outcomes started high and decreased gradually up to 8 hours into the future (lowest Pearson's r for waiting count=0.56; waiting time=0.49; occupancy level=0.78; length of stay=0.86; boarding count=0.79; boarding time=0.80). The residual means were unbiased for all outcomes except the boarding time. The discriminatory power for ambulance diversion remained consistently high up to 8 hours into the future (lowest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.86).

Conclusion

By modeling patient flow, rather than operational summary variables, our simulation forecasts several measures of near-future ED crowding, with various degrees of good performance.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: David J. Magid, MD, MPHAuthor contributions: NH and DA conceived the study. All authors contributed substantially to the study design. IJ and DA obtained research funding. NH implemented the software and collected the data. NH and CZ performed the statistical analysis. NH drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. NH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that may create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Dr. Hoot was supported by the National Library of Medicine grant LM07450-02 and National Institute of General Medical Studies grant T32 GM07347. The research was also supported by the National Library of Medicine grant R21 LM009002-01. This project is an academic endeavor. It was supported by federal funding, as noted above, and there was no corporate funding. There are no current plans to commercialize this research that would cause any conflicts of interest.Publication dates: Available online April 30, 2008.Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(07)01860-4

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.011

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 116-125, August 2008