Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 52, Issue 4 , Pages 322-328, October 2008

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of an Emergency Department Observation Unit for Acute Onset Atrial Fibrillation

  • Wyatt W. Decker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Wyatt W. Decker, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Genrose G-410, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905; 507-255-6501, fax 507-255-6592
  • ,
  • Peter A. Smars, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Lekshmi Vaidyanathan, MBBS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Deepi G. Goyal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Eric T. Boie, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Latha G. Stead, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Douglas L. Packer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Thomas D. Meloy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Andy J. Boggust, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Luis H. Haro, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Dennis A. Laudon, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Joseph K. Lobl, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Annie T. Sadosty, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Raquel M. Schears, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Nicola E. Schiebel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • David O. Hodge, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Win-Kuang Shen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

Received 21 May 2007; received in revised form 1 November 2007; accepted 12 December 2007. published online 14 March 2008.

Study objective

An emergency department (ED) observation unit protocol for the management of acute onset atrial fibrillation is compared with routine hospital admission and management.

Methods

Adult patients presenting to the ED with atrial fibrillation of less than 48 hours' duration without hemodynamic instability or other comorbid conditions requiring hospitalization were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either ED observation unit care or routine inpatient care. The ED observation unit protocol included pulse rate control, cardiac monitoring, reassessment, and electrical cardioversion if atrial fibrillation persisted. Patients who reverted to sinus rhythm were discharged with a cardiology follow-up within 3 days, whereas those still in atrial fibrillation were admitted. All cases were followed up for 6 months and adverse events recorded.

Results

Of the 153 patients, 75 were randomized to the ED observation unit and 78 to routine inhospital care. Eighty-five percent of ED observation unit patients converted to sinus rhythm versus 73% in the routine care group (difference 12%; 95% confidence interval [CI] −1% to 25%]; P=.06). The median length of stay was 10.1 versus 25.2 hours (difference 15.1 hours; 95% CI 11.2 to 19.6; P<.001) for ED observation unit and inhospital care respectively. Nine ED observation unit patients required inpatient admission. Eleven percent of the ED observation unit group had recurrence of atrial fibrillation during follow-up versus 10% of the routine inpatient care group (difference 1%; 95% CI −9% to 11%; P=.93). There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of hospitalization or the number of tests, and the number of adverse events during follow-up was similar in the 2 groups.

Conclusion

An ED observation unit protocol that includes electrical cardioversion is a feasible alternative to routine hospital admission for acute onset of atrial fibrillation and results in a shorter initial length of stay.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: W. Brian Gibler, MD

 Author contributions: WWD, PAS, DGG, ETB, DLP, TDM, AJB, LHH, DAL, JKL, ATS, RMS, NES, and W-KS made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. DOH was responsible for analysis of the data and statistical support. WWD, PAS, LV, LGS, DLP, DOH, and W-KS were responsible for drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published. WWD takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. This research was funded by a clinical research grant from the Mayo Foundation for Education and Research.

 Publication dates: Available online March 14, 2008.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(07)01871-9

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.015

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 52, Issue 4 , Pages 322-328, October 2008