Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 6 , Pages 782-789 , June 2008

Measures of Emergency Department Crowding, Odds Ratios, and the Dangers of Making Continuous Data Categorical: Answers to January 2008 Journal Club Questions

  • Tyler W. Barrett, MD

      Affiliations

    • Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
  • ,
  • David L. Schriger, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

  • Image Result

    *Patient demographic and ED crowding measures (N = 13, 758).

    *This modified version of Table 1 in the Pines and Hollander paper demonstrates how small histograms can easily be inserted into a table.

    *Patient demographic and ED crowding measures (N = 13, 758).

    *This modified version of Table 1 in the Pines and Hollander paper demonstrates how small histograms can easily be inserted into a table.

 Editor's note: These questions and answers refer to the Pines and Hollander paper on the effect of emergency department crowding on analgesia administration [Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 51:1-5]. Readers should recognize that these are suggested answers and, although it is hoped that they are correct, are by no means comprehensive. There are many other points that could be made about these questions or about the article in general. Questions are rated “novice,” (), “intermediate,” (), and “advanced” (). Readers should also note that Drs. Pines and Hollander shared their data set with us so that we could better illustrate some of the points we make in the answers and, when we found a few inconsequential blemishes in their data set, granted us permission to use these blemishes as teaching points. We acknowledge their generosity and note that the kinds of errors we detected are likely to be found in any large clinical data set.

PII: S0196-0644(07)01947-6

doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.024

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 6 , Pages 782-789 , June 2008