« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 6
, Pages 782-789
, June 2008
Measures of Emergency Department Crowding, Odds Ratios, and the Dangers of Making Continuous Data Categorical: Answers to January 2008 Journal Club Questions
References
- . Modern Epidemiology. In: 2nd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998;p. 74–75
- Key indicators of crowding in Canadian emergency departments: a Delphi study. Can J Emerg Med. 2007;9:339–346
- Measuring and forecasting emergency department crowding in real time. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:747–755
- The impact of emergency department crowding measures on time to antibiotics for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50:517–519
- . Comparison of the National Emergency Department Crowding Scale and the Emergency Department Work Index for quantifying emergency department crowding. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:513–518
- Emergency department crowding: consensus development of potential measures. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:824–834
- The emergency department occupancy rate: a simple measure of emergency department crowding?. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51:15–24
- . The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ. 2006;332:1216
- . Measures of effect and association. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S editor. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998;p. 47–59
- . Proportions, odds, and risk. Radiology. 2004;230:12–19
- Designing cross-sectional and case-control studies. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, et al. editor. Designing Clinical Research. 3rd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007;p. 124–125
- . Modern Epidemiology. In: 2nd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998;p. 373–374
Editor's note: These questions and answers refer to the Pines and Hollander paper on the effect of emergency department crowding on analgesia administration [Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 51:1-5]. Readers should recognize that these are suggested answers and, although it is hoped that they are correct, are by no means comprehensive. There are many other points that could be made about these questions or about the article in general. Questions are rated “novice,” (
), “intermediate,” (
), and “advanced” (
). Readers should also note that Drs. Pines and Hollander shared their data set with us so that we could better illustrate some of the points we make in the answers and, when we found a few inconsequential blemishes in their data set, granted us permission to use these blemishes as teaching points. We acknowledge their generosity and note that the kinds of errors we detected are likely to be found in any large clinical data set.
PII: S0196-0644(07)01947-6
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.024
© 2008 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 51, Issue 6
, Pages 782-789
, June 2008
