Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 53, Issue 3 , Pages 341-350.e2, March 2009

The Random Dialing Survey as a Tool for Community Consultation for Research Involving the Emergency Medicine Exception From Informed Consent

  • Eileen M. Bulger, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Eileen M. Bulger, MD, Box 359796 Harborview Medical Center, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98104; 206-731-6448, fax 206-731-3656
  • ,
  • Terri A. Schmidt, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
  • ,
  • Andrea J. Cook, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Karen J. Brasel, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
  • ,
  • Denise E. Griffiths, BS

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
  • ,
  • Peter J. Kudenchuk, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Daniel Davis, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of California, San Diego, CA
  • ,
  • Berit Bardarson, RN

      Affiliations

    • University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Ahamed H. Idris, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
  • ,
  • Tom P. Aufderheide, MD

      Affiliations

    • Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
  • ,
  • The ROC Investigators

Received 12 March 2008; received in revised form 30 April 2008 and 16 June 2008; accepted 14 July 2008. published online 29 September 2008.

Study objective

In 1996, the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services enacted rules allowing a narrow exception from informed consent for critically ill patients enrolled in emergency research. These include requirements for community consultation prior to trial implementation. Previous studies have noted difficulty in engaging the community. We seek to describe the experience with random dialing surveys as a tool for community consultation across 5 metropolitan regions in the United States.

Methods

Random dialing surveys were used as part of the community consultation for an out-of-hospital clinical trial sponsored by the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. The survey method was designed to obtain a representative sample of the community according to population demographics and geography. Logistics of survey administration, role of the survey in community consultation, and survey results by population demographics are discussed.

Results

Random dialing surveys were conducted in 5 of 8 US Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium sites. Overall, 70% to 79% of respondents indicated they would be willing to be enrolled in this study. Support for the inclusion of children (aged 15 to 18 years) ranged from 52% to 71%. Respondents aged 18 to 34 years were more willing to participate in the trial than older age groups. Women and racial minorities were less likely to favor the inclusion of minors.

Conclusion

Random dialing surveys provide an additional tool to engage the community and obtain a sample of the opinion of the population about research conducted under the emergency exception from informed consent regulations. Similar results were obtained across 5 diverse communities in the United States.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Theodore R. Delbridge, MD, MPH

 Author contributions: All authors were involved in conception and design of the study and data acquisition. EMB was responsible for data analysis and primary drafting of the article. AJC provided statistical support for data analysis. TAS, AJC, KJB, DEG, PJK, DD, BB, AHI, and TPA contributed to critical revision of the article. EMB takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. This study was supported by a cooperative agreement (5U01 HL077863) with the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute in partnership with the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)–Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health, Defense Research and Development Canada, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

 Publication dates: Available online September 27, 2008.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(08)01512-6

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.021

Refers to article:

  • Community Consultation by Randomly Reaching Out to the Community , 05 November 2008

    Roger J. Lewis
    Annals of Emergency Medicine March 2009 (Vol. 53, Issue 3, Pages 351-353)

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 53, Issue 3 , Pages 341-350.e2, March 2009