Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 54, Issue 2 , Pages 221-225, August 2009

Safety and Efficacy of Rapid Titration Using 1mg Doses of Intravenous Hydromorphone in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Severe Pain: The “1+1” Protocol

Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY

Received 5 August 2008; received in revised form 8 September 2008 and 11 September 2008; accepted 18 September 2008. published online 11 November 2008.

Study objective

We evaluate the safety and efficacy of a pain protocol using 1 mg intravenous (IV) hydromorphone followed by an optional dose of 1 mg IV hydromorphone 15 minutes later.

Methods

Prospective interventional study at an urban academic emergency department (ED). One milligram of IV hydromorphone was administered to adults 21 to 64 years of age who had acute severe pain. Fifteen minutes later, patients were asked whether they wanted more pain medication. If they answered yes, they received another 1 mg of IV hydromorphone and were again asked 15 minutes later whether they wanted more pain medication. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who had adequate analgesia, defined as declining additional hydromorphone within 1 hour of entering the protocol. The primary safety outcome was incidence of oxygen desaturation less than 95%. Secondary outcomes included numeric rating scale pain scores and adverse events.

Results

Of the 223 patients with complete data, 1 mg IV hydromorphone provided adequate analgesia for 77% (95% confidence interval 71% to 82%) within 15 minutes and 96% (95% confidence interval 92% to 98%) within 1 hour of entering the protocol. Eighty-six percent of patients reported pain scores that decreased by 2 or more numeric rating scale units. Five percent experienced transient oxygen desaturation below 95%, which was corrected promptly with oxygen.

Conclusion

A rapid titration protocol using IV hydromorphone (1 mg hydromorphone followed by an optional 1 mg 15 minutes later) is efficacious in nonelderly ED patients with acute severe pain. There were no serious adverse events.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Steven M. Green, MD

 Author contributions: AKC, PEB, MKM, and EJG conceived the study and designed the trial. AKC and CMC managed the data, including quality control. PEB analyzed the data and provided all figures and tables. AKC drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its multiple revisions. AKC takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Dr. Chang was supported by a Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Research Training Grant.

 Publication date: Available online November 8, 2008.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(08)01781-2

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.017

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 54, Issue 2 , Pages 221-225, August 2009