Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 53, Issue 6 , Pages 762-766, June 2009

Parental Preferences for Boarding Locations When a Children's Hospital Exceeds Capacity

  • Bridgette D. Guthrie, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Bridgette D. Guthrie, MD, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Memorial Hospital, 2300 Children's Plaza, Box 62, Chicago, IL 60614; 773-880-8245, Fax 773-880-8267
  • ,
  • William D. King, DrPH MPH, RPh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
  • ,
  • Kathy W. Monroe, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL

Received 21 August 2008; received in revised form 13 October 2008 and 11 November 2008; accepted 1 December 2008. published online 02 February 2009.

Study objective

Our objective is to determine parental preferences for boarding locations when a children's hospital is at full capacity. We also assess parental interest in transfer to a general hospital when a children's hospital is experiencing crowding.

Methods

Eligible patients were surveyed within 24 hours of admission. Surveys were completed in emergency department (ED) and inpatient areas. Previous admission was not required; children with chronic illnesses were included. Parents were asked whether they would prefer their child to board in an ED hallway or inpatient hallway or whether they had no preference. Parents were also asked the maximum acceptable waiting time for an inpatient bed and whether they would prefer to be transferred to another hospital should the children's hospital not have a bed available. Responses were hypothetical and confidential and did not affect care.

Results

A total of 382 patients met enrollment criteria and 359 (94%) were enrolled; 58.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 53.5% to 63.9%) preferred boarding on inpatient hallways, 11.1% (95% CI 8.2% to 15.0%) preferred ED hallways, and 30.1% (95% CI 25.4% to 35.2%) had no preference. Seventy percent (95% CI 65.2% to 74.9%) of parents preferred to wait at a children's hospital despite crowding. Most parents believed that the maximum acceptable waiting time was less than or equal to 3 hours.

Conclusion

Parents of pediatric patients prefer boarding on inpatient hallways over ED hallways. The majority of parents prefer to remain at a children's hospital despite crowded conditions, but some parents may be amenable to transfer. These results may help institutions develop strategies to improve patient satisfaction when hospital capacity is exceeded.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Kathy N. Shaw, MD, MSCE

 Author contributions: BDG and KWM conceived the study, undertook recruitment of patients, and managed the data, including quality control. WDK provided statistical advice on study design and analyzed the data. BDG drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. BDG takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.

 Publication date: Available online January 29, 2009.

PII: S0196-0644(08)02065-9

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.003

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 53, Issue 6 , Pages 762-766, June 2009