Crowding Delays Treatment and Lengthens Emergency Department Length of Stay, Even Among High-Acuity Patients
Study objective
We determine the effect of crowding on emergency department (ED) waiting room, treatment, and boarding times across multiple sites and acuity groups.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study that included ED visit and inpatient medicine occupancy data for a 1-year period at 4 EDs. We measured crowding at 30-minute intervals throughout each patient's ED stay. We estimated the effect of crowding on waiting room time, treatment time, and boarding time separately, using discrete-time survival analysis with time-dependent crowding measures (ie, number waiting, number being treated, number boarding, and inpatient medicine occupancy rate), controlling for patient demographic and clinical characteristics.
Results
Crowding substantially delayed patients' waiting room and boarding times but not treatment time. During the day shift, when the number boarding increased from the 50th to the 90th percentile, the adjusted median waiting room time (range 26 to 70 minutes) increased by 6% to 78% (range 33 to 82 minutes), and the adjusted median boarding time (range 250 to 626 minutes) increased by 15% to 47% (range 288 to 921 minutes), depending on the site. Crowding delayed the care of high-acuity level 2 patients at all sites. During crowded periods (ie, 90%), the adjusted median waiting room times of high-acuity level 2 patients were 3% to 35% higher than during normal periods, depending on the site and crowding measure.
Conclusion
Using discrete-time survival analysis, we were able to dynamically measure crowding throughout each patient's ED visit and demonstrate its deleterious effect on the timeliness of emergency care, even for high-acuity patients.
Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
Supervising editor: Donald M. Yealy, MD
Author contributions: All of the authors were involved in the study concept and design, drafting of the article, and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. The objectives, data collection protocol, review of the analysis, and findings were discussed by teleconference calls with all of the investigators. MLM, JSD, JL, and DA were responsible for acquiring the data from their sites and obtaining institutional review board approval. RD performed the data analysis under the supervision of MLM and SLZ. However, all of the authors had input into the variables considered for the analysis and how it was conducted. MLM drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. MLM takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.
Earn CME Credit: Continuing Medical Education is available for this article at: www.ACEP-EMedHome.com.
Publication date: Available online May 6, 2009.
PII: S0196-0644(09)00239-X
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.006
© 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Advancing the Science of Emergency Department Crowding: Measurement and Solutions , 03 July 2009
