Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 54, Issue 3 , Pages 344-348.e1, September 2009

A Feasibility Study of the Sensitivity of Emergency Physician Dysphagia Screening in Acute Stroke Patients

Presented as a poster at the American College of Emergency Physicians Scientific Assembly, October 2008, Chicago, IL.

  • Danielle E. Turner-Lawrence, MD

      Affiliations

    • William Beaumont Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • ,
  • Meredith Peebles, CCC-SLP

      Affiliations

    • Department of Speech and Audiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC
  • ,
  • Marlow F. Price, RN

      Affiliations

    • Neuroscience and Spine Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC
  • ,
  • Sam J. Singh, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC
  • ,
  • Andrew W. Asimos, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Andrew W. Asimos, MD, Carolinas Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, PO Box 32861, Charlotte, NC, 28232-2861; 704-355-4212, fax 704-355-5609

Received 12 December 2008; received in revised form 6 February 2009; accepted 4 March 2009. published online 13 April 2009.

Study objective

To determine the sensitivity of dysphagia screening by emergency physicians on acute stroke patients.

Methods

To develop a 2-tiered dysphagia screen and performed it on a convenience sample of acute stroke patients. Tier 1 examined voice quality, swallowing complaints, facial asymmetry, and aphasia. Tier 2 involved a water swallow test, with evaluation for swallowing difficulty, voice quality compromise, and pulse oximetry desaturation (≥2%). We classified patients passing both tiers as “low risk” and compared the screen's sensitivity to a formal assessment by speech language pathologists. To assess reproducibility, we performed 2 consecutive, blinded ED screens on a convenience sample of 32 patients.

Results

During 16 months, we enrolled a convenience sample of 103 patients, excluding 19 patients from data analysis for lack of a stroke discharge diagnosis (n=11), an incomplete speech language pathologist evaluation within 24 hours (n=7), or pneumonia on emergency department (ED) chest radiography (n=1). Of the 84 remaining patients, speech language pathologists identified dysphagia in 48. The sensitivity of the ED dysphagia screen was 96% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85% to 99%), with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.08 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.3). Reproducibility testing yielded a κ for the overall screen result of 0.9 (95% CI 0.9-1.0) and a simple agreement of 97%.

Conclusion

Preliminary data on the sensitivity and reliability of our ED dysphagia screening tool are promising. The simple screen provides an easy way for emergency physicians to identify acute stroke patients eligible for early oral medications and nutrition. Further validation and refinement of our screen are needed before its widespread adoption.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supervising editor: Robert Silbergleit, MD

 Author contributions: DET-L and AWA conceived the study, designed the trial, and obtained research funding. DET-L, MP, MFP, and AWA supervised the conduct of the trial, patient enrollment, and data collection. DET-L and SJS performed chart review and some data collection. DET-L and AWA provided statistical advice. DET-L performed all data analyses. DET-L drafted the article, and AWA contributed substantially to its revision. DET-L and AWA take responsibility for the paper as a whole.

 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Supported by an Emergency Medicine Foundation 2007-2008 Resident Research Grant.

 Publication date: Available online May 2, 2009.

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S0196-0644(09)00240-6

doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.007

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 54, Issue 3 , Pages 344-348.e1, September 2009