A Feasibility Study of the Sensitivity of Emergency Physician Dysphagia Screening in Acute Stroke Patients
Study objective
To determine the sensitivity of dysphagia screening by emergency physicians on acute stroke patients.
Methods
To develop a 2-tiered dysphagia screen and performed it on a convenience sample of acute stroke patients. Tier 1 examined voice quality, swallowing complaints, facial asymmetry, and aphasia. Tier 2 involved a water swallow test, with evaluation for swallowing difficulty, voice quality compromise, and pulse oximetry desaturation (≥2%). We classified patients passing both tiers as “low risk” and compared the screen's sensitivity to a formal assessment by speech language pathologists. To assess reproducibility, we performed 2 consecutive, blinded ED screens on a convenience sample of 32 patients.
Results
During 16 months, we enrolled a convenience sample of 103 patients, excluding 19 patients from data analysis for lack of a stroke discharge diagnosis (n=11), an incomplete speech language pathologist evaluation within 24 hours (n=7), or pneumonia on emergency department (ED) chest radiography (n=1). Of the 84 remaining patients, speech language pathologists identified dysphagia in 48. The sensitivity of the ED dysphagia screen was 96% (95% confidence interval [CI] 85% to 99%), with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.08 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.3). Reproducibility testing yielded a κ for the overall screen result of 0.9 (95% CI 0.9-1.0) and a simple agreement of 97%.
Conclusion
Preliminary data on the sensitivity and reliability of our ED dysphagia screening tool are promising. The simple screen provides an easy way for emergency physicians to identify acute stroke patients eligible for early oral medications and nutrition. Further validation and refinement of our screen are needed before its widespread adoption.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supervising editor: Robert Silbergleit, MD
Author contributions: DET-L and AWA conceived the study, designed the trial, and obtained research funding. DET-L, MP, MFP, and AWA supervised the conduct of the trial, patient enrollment, and data collection. DET-L and SJS performed chart review and some data collection. DET-L and AWA provided statistical advice. DET-L performed all data analyses. DET-L drafted the article, and AWA contributed substantially to its revision. DET-L and AWA take responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Supported by an Emergency Medicine Foundation 2007-2008 Resident Research Grant.
Publication date: Available online May 2, 2009.
Reprints not available from the authors.
PII: S0196-0644(09)00240-6
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.007
© 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
