The Prevalence and Factors Associated With QTc Prolongation Among Emergency Department Patients
Study objective
Previous studies have suggested that QTc prolongation may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of QTc prolongation among emergency department (ED) patients is unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of QTc prolongation among ED patients.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of ED and inpatient data for all patients with an ECG conducted for any reason at a tertiary care university ED during a 3-month period. QTc prolongation was defined as computer-generated QTc intervals greater than or equal to 450 ms for men and greater than or equal to 460 ms for women.
Results
Of the 1,558 eligible cases, 544 patients had QTc prolongation (35%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 32% to 37%). The prevalence of QTc intervals greater than or equal to 500 ms was 8% (120/1,558; 95% CI 6% to 9%). The most common comorbidities were structural heart disease, renal failure, and stroke. Forty-four percent (239/544; 95% CI 40% to 48%) of patients with any degree of QTc prolongation were discharged from the ED. Furthermore, 23% (28/120; 95% CI 16% to 32%) of patients with QTc intervals greater than or equal to 500 ms were discharged from the ED, including 16 patients with QTc intervals greater than or equal to 500 ms and QRS durations less than 120 ms (16/60; 27%; 95% CI 16% to 40%). Five percent of the patients with QTc prolongation died in the ED or during hospitalization (27/544; 95% CI 3% to 7%); none had QTc prolongation or torsades de pointes listed as a cause of death.
Conclusion
QTc prolongation occurred frequently among ED patients who had an ECG study for any reason. Nearly half of all patients with QTc prolongation were discharged from the ED.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
Supervising editors: Deborah B. Diercks, MD; Michael L. Callaham, MD
Author contributions: MWS conceived the study. MWS, PHA, MH, and ABW designed the study. MWS and PHA supervised the data collection. MWS, PHA, STCC, BWW, and GDF collected the study data. MH provided statistical advice for the study. PHA and MH analyzed the data. MWS and PHA drafted the article. All authors contributed to the manuscript revision. MWS takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.
Reprints not available from the authors.
Publication date: Available online May 6, 2009.
PII: S0196-0644(09)00283-2
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.021
© 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
