« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 54, Issue 2
, Pages 171-180.e4
, August 2009
Predictors of Emesis and Recovery Agitation With Emergency Department Ketamine Sedation: An Individual-Patient Data Meta-Analysis of 8,282 Children
References
- . Ketamine and neurotoxicity: clinical perspectives and implications for emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:181–190
- Predictors of airway and respiratory adverse events with ketamine sedation in the emergency department: an individual-patient data meta-analysis of 8,282 children. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:158–168
- Intramuscular ketamine for pediatric sedation in the emergency department: safety profile with 1,022 cases. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;31:688–697
- Preprocedural fasting and adverse events in procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: are they related?. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:454–459
- A randomized, controlled trial of IV versus IM ketamine for sedation of pediatric patients receiving emergency department orthopedic procedures. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:605–612
- Is atropine needed with ketamine sedation? (a prospective, randomized, double blind study). Emerg Med J. 2006;23:206–209
- . Clinical practice guideline for emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:460–471
- Predictors of adverse events with ketamine sedation in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35:35–42
- . Removal of esophageal foreign bodies in the pediatric ED: is ketamine an option?. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20:96–98
- . Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet. 2006;367:766–780
- Does adjunctive midazolam reduce recovery agitation after ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures? (a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial). Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35:239–244
- Effect of ondansetron on the incidence of vomiting associated with ketamine sedation in children: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52:30–34
- . Incidence and severity of recovery agitation following ketamine sedation in young adults. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23:142–144
- A comparison of intramuscular ketamine with high dose intramuscular midazolam with and without intranasal flumazenil in children before suturing. Emerg Med J. 2001;18:34–38
- . The Lancaster experience of 2.0 to 2.5 mg/kg intramuscular ketamine for paediatric sedation: 501 cases and analysis. Emerg Med J. 2004;21:290–295
- . Selective indications for ketamine anaesthesia. Proc R Soc Med. 1971;64:1156–1159
- . Ketamine for cardiac catheterisation. Anaesthesia. 1971;26:318–323
- . Anaesthesia for the surgeon-anaesthetist in difficult situations. Anaesthesia. 1970;25:36–45
- Ketamine sedation for pediatric gastroenterology procedures. J Pediatr Gastroent Nutr. 2001;32:26–33
- Ketamine sedation for pediatric critical care procedures. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001;17:244–248
- . Should I give ketamine IV or IM [editorial]?. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:613–614
- Adjunctive atropine is unnecessary during ketamine sedation in children. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:314–318
- Does midazolam alter the clinical effects of intravenous ketamine sedation in children? (a double-blind, randomized, controlled emergency department trial). Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36:579–588
- . Midazolam with ketamine: who benefits [editorial]?. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35:297–299
Provide feedback for this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
Supervising editors: Kathy N. Shaw, MD, MSCE; Michael L. Callaham, MD
Dr. Shaw and Dr. Callaham were the supervising editors on this article. Dr. Green did not participate in the editorial review or decision to publish this article.
Author contributions: SMG conceived and designed the study. The methodology was critiqued and revised with extensive input from MGR, BK, LB, DA, RDP, JEW, and GT. All authors reviewed and recoded their data to comply with study definitions, and before data analysis the study protocol was critiqued and refined by all authors. SMG performed the data analysis, and a writing committee composed of SMG, MGR, and BK then created the article. All authors critiqued the draft and there were substantial revisions. SMG takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement.
Publication date: Available online June 6, 2009.
Reprints not available from the authors.
PII: S0196-0644(09)00372-2
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.04.004
© 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 54, Issue 2
, Pages 171-180.e4
, August 2009
