« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 54, Issue 4
, Pages 575-584
, October 2009
Clinical Prediction Rules for Identifying Adults at Very Low Risk for Intra-abdominal Injuries After Blunt Trauma
References
- Deaths: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;55:1–119
- . Evaluation of the abdomen in intoxicated patients: is computed tomography scan or peritoneal lavage always indicated?. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:500–502
- Blunt abdominal trauma patients: can organ injury be excluded without performing computed tomography?. J Trauma. 2004;57:1072–1081
- . Recognition of intra-abdominal injury in blunt trauma victims (A prospective study comparing physical examination with peritoneal lavage). Am Surg. 1982;48:457–459
- The value of physical examination in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study. Injury. 1997;28:261–265
- Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury: results of a prospective study. Arch Surg. 2006;141:468–473discussion 473-475
- . Are diagnostic peritoneal lavage or focused abdominal sonography for trauma safe screening investigations for hemodynamically stable patients after blunt abdominal trauma? (A review of the literature). J Trauma. 2007;62:779–784
- The role of negative CT of the abdomen and pelvis in the decision to admit adults from the emergency department after blunt trauma. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2:889–895
- . Performance of abdominal ultrasonography in blunt trauma patients with out-of-hospital or emergency department hypotension. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:354–361
- . Computed tomography and blunt abdominal injury: patient selection based on examination, haematocrit and haematuria. Injury. 1997;28:181–185
- . Blunt abdominal trauma: current imaging techniques and CT findings in patients with solid organ, bowel, and mesenteric injury. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007;28:115–129
- . Computed tomography for evaluating blunt abdominal trauma in the low-volume nondesignated trauma center: the procedure of choice?. J Trauma. 1998;45:64–68
- . Multidetector CT evaluation of abdominal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005;43:1079–1095viii
- Use of abdominal computed tomography in blunt trauma: do we scan too much?. Can J Surg. 2000;43:16–21
- Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–296
- . Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology. 2004;232:735–738
- . Cancer screening with CT: dose controversy. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(suppl 4):D55–D61
- . Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284
- Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:100–105
- Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group). N Engl J Med. 2000;343:94–99
- Developing a decision instrument to guide computed tomographic imaging of blunt head injury patients. J Trauma. 2005;59:954–959
- The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001;357:1391–1396
- The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286:1841–1848
- Selective use of computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1995;38:727–731
- Intra-abdominal injury following blunt trauma (Identifying the high-risk patient using objective risk factors). Arch Surg. 1989;124:809–813
- . Diagnostic peritoneal lavage versus abdominal computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma: a review of prospective studies. Can J Surg. 1995;38:117–122
- Evaluation of a diagnostic protocol using screening diagnostic peritoneal lavage with selective use of abdominal computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1999;46:847–852
- . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174
- . Classification and Regression Trees. Washington, DC: Chapman & Hall; 1984;
- . Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:437–447
- Organ injuries associated with femoral fractures: implications for severity of injury in motor vehicle collisions. J Trauma. 1999;46:386–391
- Pelvic fractures: epidemiology and predictors of associated abdominal injuries and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:1–10
- Injuries distracting from intraabdominal injuries after blunt trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:145–149
- Do all patients with left costal margin injuries require radiographic evaluation for intraabdominal injury?. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46:232–236
- Identification of children with intra-abdominal injuries after blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:500–509
- Identifying injuries and motor vehicle collision characteristics that together are suggestive of diaphragmatic rupture. J Trauma. 2002;53:1139–1145
- Assessing the true risk of abdominal solid organ injury in hospitalized rib fracture patients. J Trauma. 2001;50:684–688
- . The “seat belt mark” sign: a call for increased vigilance among physicians treating victims of motor vehicle accidents. Am Surg. 1999;65:181–185
- Combined head and abdominal computed tomography for blunt trauma: which patients with minor head trauma benefit most?. Emerg Radiol. 2006;13:61–67
- Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:475–483
- Evaluation of liver function tests in screening for intra-abdominal injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:838–841
- . Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:201–209
- Admission or observation is not necessary after a negative abdominal computed tomographic scan in patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial. J Trauma. 1998;44:273–280discussion 280-282
- Relatively short diagnostic delays (<8 hours) produce morbidity and mortality in blunt small bowel injury: an analysis of time to operative intervention in 198 patients from a multicenter experience. J Trauma. 2000;48:408–414discussion 414-415
- Associated injuries in blunt solid organ trauma: implications for missed injury in nonoperative management. J Trauma. 2002;53:238–242discussion 242-244
- Time to laparotomy for intra-abdominal bleeding from trauma does affect survival for delays up to 90 minutes. J Trauma. 2002;52:420–425
- Quantitative assessment of diagnostic radiation doses in adult blunt trauma patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52:93–97
- . Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32:228-223; discussion 242-244
- . Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1385–1388
- Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both (A prospective controlled study). N Engl J Med. 1989;320:143–149
- . Clinical prediction rules (A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards). JAMA. 1997;277:488–494
- Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules (Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group). JAMA. 2000;284:79–84
- . Patterns of injury in belted and unbelted individuals presenting to a trauma center after motor vehicle crash: seat belt syndrome revisited. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32:418–424
- Utility of routine laboratory testing for detecting intra-abdominal injury in the pediatric trauma patient. Pediatrics. 1993;92:691–694
- Blunt abdominal trauma: clinical value of negative screening US scans. Radiology. 2004;230:661–668
Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
Supervising editor: Judd E. Hollander, MD
Author contributions: JFH was responsible for the study concept and supervision, analyzing and interpreting the data, and drafting the article. JFH, WRM, and NK were responsible for the study design. JFH, DHW, and JPM acquired the data. All authors were responsible for critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. JFH and NK provided statistical expertise and obtained funding. JH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article that might create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Funded in part by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Research Training Grant.
Publication date: Available online May 19, 2009.
PII: S0196-0644(09)00398-9
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.04.007
© 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 54, Issue 4
, Pages 575-584
, October 2009
